From: Eric Botcazou Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 08:21:30 +0000 (+0200) Subject: Fix oversight in handling of reverse SSO in SRA pass X-Git-Tag: basepoints/gcc-13~5558 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4e3129b0caceec008a940aa5eada253cd0f0b3ec;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git Fix oversight in handling of reverse SSO in SRA pass The scalar storage order does not apply to pointer and vector components. gcc/ PR tree-optimization/101626 * tree-sra.c (propagate_subaccesses_from_rhs): Do not set the reverse scalar storage order on a pointer or vector component. gcc/testsuite/ * gcc.dg/sso-15.c: New test. --- diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/sso-15.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/sso-15.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..d8a711d65767 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/sso-15.c @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-O2" } */ + +#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__ +#define REV_ENDIANNESS __attribute__((scalar_storage_order("big-endian"))) +#else +#define REV_ENDIANNESS __attribute__((scalar_storage_order("little-endian"))) +#endif + +struct X { int *p; } REV_ENDIANNESS; + +struct X x; + +struct X __attribute__((noinline)) foo (int *p) +{ + struct X x; + x.p = p; + return x; +} + +void __attribute((noinline)) bar (void) +{ + *x.p = 1; +} + +extern void abort (void); + +int main (void) +{ + int i = 0; + x = foo(&i); + bar(); + if (i != 1) + abort (); + return 0; +} diff --git a/gcc/tree-sra.c b/gcc/tree-sra.c index c05d22f3e8f1..3a9e14f50a08 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-sra.c +++ b/gcc/tree-sra.c @@ -2790,7 +2790,10 @@ propagate_subaccesses_from_rhs (struct access *lacc, struct access *racc) { /* We are about to change the access type from aggregate to scalar, so we need to put the reverse flag onto the access, if any. */ - const bool reverse = TYPE_REVERSE_STORAGE_ORDER (lacc->type); + const bool reverse + = TYPE_REVERSE_STORAGE_ORDER (lacc->type) + && !POINTER_TYPE_P (racc->type) + && !VECTOR_TYPE_P (racc->type); tree t = lacc->base; lacc->type = racc->type;