From: Iain Buclaw Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 11:24:34 +0000 (+0200) Subject: d: Wrong evaluation order of binary expressions (PR101640) X-Git-Tag: basepoints/gcc-13~5748 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=54ec50bada94a8ff92edb04ee5216c27fa4bf942;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git d: Wrong evaluation order of binary expressions (PR101640) The use of fold_build2 can in some cases swap the order of its operands if that is the more optimal thing to do. However this breaks semantic guarantee of left-to-right evaluation in D. PR d/101640 gcc/d/ChangeLog: * expr.cc (binary_op): Use build2 instead of fold_build2. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gdc.dg/pr96429.d: Update test. * gdc.dg/pr101640.d: New test. --- diff --git a/gcc/d/expr.cc b/gcc/d/expr.cc index e76cae98f7e2..b78778eb8ef0 100644 --- a/gcc/d/expr.cc +++ b/gcc/d/expr.cc @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ binary_op (tree_code code, tree type, tree arg0, tree arg1) eptype = type; } - ret = fold_build2 (code, eptype, arg0, arg1); + ret = build2 (code, eptype, arg0, arg1); } return d_convert (type, ret); diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gdc.dg/pr101640.d b/gcc/testsuite/gdc.dg/pr101640.d new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..68de40885127 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gdc.dg/pr101640.d @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +// https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101640 +// { dg-do compile } +// { dg-options "-fdump-tree-original" } + +int fun101640(ref int); + +int test101640(int val) +{ + // { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "= val \\\+ fun101640 \\\(\\\(int &\\\) &val\\\);" "original" } } + return val + fun101640(val); +} diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gdc.dg/pr96429.d b/gcc/testsuite/gdc.dg/pr96429.d index af096e26b5af..9940a03e0ecb 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gdc.dg/pr96429.d +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gdc.dg/pr96429.d @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ // { dg-options "-fdump-tree-original" } ptrdiff_t subbyte(byte* bp1, byte* bp2) { - // { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "bp1 - bp2;" "original" } } + // { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "\\\(bp1 - bp2\\\) /\\\[ex\\\] 1;" "original" } } return bp1 - bp2; }