From: Frederic Weisbecker Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 16:02:43 +0000 (+0200) Subject: locking/lockdep: Use expanded masks on find_usage_*() functions X-Git-Tag: v5.2-rc1~206^2~7 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=627f364d24c009b61c9199b2c75006e35c294675;p=thirdparty%2Fkernel%2Flinux.git locking/lockdep: Use expanded masks on find_usage_*() functions In order to optimize check_irq_usage() and factorize all the IRQ usage validations we'll need to be able to check multiple lock usage bits at once. Prepare the low level usage mask check functions for that purpose. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Paul E. McKenney Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Will Deacon Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190402160244.32434-4-frederic@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index 2288aa2fa4c68..5e149dd782989 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -1682,9 +1682,9 @@ check_redundant(struct lock_list *root, struct lock_class *target, * without creating any illegal irq-safe -> irq-unsafe lock dependency. */ -static inline int usage_match(struct lock_list *entry, void *bit) +static inline int usage_match(struct lock_list *entry, void *mask) { - return entry->class->usage_mask & (1 << (enum lock_usage_bit)bit); + return entry->class->usage_mask & *(unsigned long *)mask; } @@ -1700,14 +1700,14 @@ static inline int usage_match(struct lock_list *entry, void *bit) * Return <0 on error. */ static int -find_usage_forwards(struct lock_list *root, enum lock_usage_bit bit, +find_usage_forwards(struct lock_list *root, unsigned long usage_mask, struct lock_list **target_entry) { int result; debug_atomic_inc(nr_find_usage_forwards_checks); - result = __bfs_forwards(root, (void *)bit, usage_match, target_entry); + result = __bfs_forwards(root, &usage_mask, usage_match, target_entry); return result; } @@ -1723,14 +1723,14 @@ find_usage_forwards(struct lock_list *root, enum lock_usage_bit bit, * Return <0 on error. */ static int -find_usage_backwards(struct lock_list *root, enum lock_usage_bit bit, +find_usage_backwards(struct lock_list *root, unsigned long usage_mask, struct lock_list **target_entry) { int result; debug_atomic_inc(nr_find_usage_backwards_checks); - result = __bfs_backwards(root, (void *)bit, usage_match, target_entry); + result = __bfs_backwards(root, &usage_mask, usage_match, target_entry); return result; } @@ -1935,7 +1935,7 @@ check_usage(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev, this.parent = NULL; this.class = hlock_class(prev); - ret = find_usage_backwards(&this, bit_backwards, &target_entry); + ret = find_usage_backwards(&this, lock_flag(bit_backwards), &target_entry); if (ret < 0) return print_bfs_bug(ret); if (ret == 1) @@ -1943,7 +1943,7 @@ check_usage(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev, that.parent = NULL; that.class = hlock_class(next); - ret = find_usage_forwards(&that, bit_forwards, &target_entry1); + ret = find_usage_forwards(&that, lock_flag(bit_forwards), &target_entry1); if (ret < 0) return print_bfs_bug(ret); if (ret == 1) @@ -2941,7 +2941,7 @@ check_usage_forwards(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, root.parent = NULL; root.class = hlock_class(this); - ret = find_usage_forwards(&root, bit, &target_entry); + ret = find_usage_forwards(&root, lock_flag(bit), &target_entry); if (ret < 0) return print_bfs_bug(ret); if (ret == 1) @@ -2965,7 +2965,7 @@ check_usage_backwards(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, root.parent = NULL; root.class = hlock_class(this); - ret = find_usage_backwards(&root, bit, &target_entry); + ret = find_usage_backwards(&root, lock_flag(bit), &target_entry); if (ret < 0) return print_bfs_bug(ret); if (ret == 1)