From: Gustavo Romero Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 20:10:38 +0000 (+0000) Subject: gdb/testsuite: Add unit tests for qIsAddressTagged packet X-Git-Tag: gdb-15-branchpoint~339 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=648a8c6168fac3332f4d67ef0266bdb6917eb6be;p=thirdparty%2Fbinutils-gdb.git gdb/testsuite: Add unit tests for qIsAddressTagged packet Add unit tests for testing qIsAddressTagged packet request creation and reply checks. Signed-off-by: Gustavo Romero Approved-By: Luis Machado Tested-By: Luis Machado --- diff --git a/gdb/remote.c b/gdb/remote.c index 3d034bb1ef8..cfb54de157d 100644 --- a/gdb/remote.c +++ b/gdb/remote.c @@ -15682,6 +15682,8 @@ test_memory_tagging_functions () scoped_restore restore_memtag_support_ = make_scoped_restore (&config->support); + struct gdbarch *gdbarch = current_inferior ()->arch (); + /* Test memory tagging packet support. */ config->support = PACKET_SUPPORT_UNKNOWN; SELF_CHECK (remote.supports_memory_tagging () == false); @@ -15748,6 +15750,71 @@ test_memory_tagging_functions () create_store_memtags_request (packet, 0xdeadbeef, 255, 1, tags); SELF_CHECK (memcmp (packet.data (), expected.c_str (), expected.length ()) == 0); + + /* Test creating a qIsAddressTagged request. */ + expected = "qIsAddressTagged:deadbeef"; + create_is_address_tagged_request (gdbarch, packet, 0xdeadbeef); + SELF_CHECK (strcmp (packet.data (), expected.c_str ()) == 0); + + /* Test error reply on qIsAddressTagged request. */ + reply = "E00"; + strcpy (packet.data (), reply.c_str ()); + /* is_tagged must not change, hence it's tested too. */ + bool is_tagged = false; + SELF_CHECK (check_is_address_tagged_reply (&remote, packet, is_tagged) == + false); + SELF_CHECK (is_tagged == false); + + /* Test 'tagged' as reply. */ + reply = "01"; + strcpy (packet.data (), reply.c_str ()); + /* Because the byte is 01, is_tagged should be set to true. */ + is_tagged = false; + SELF_CHECK (check_is_address_tagged_reply (&remote, packet, is_tagged) == + true); + SELF_CHECK (is_tagged == true); + + /* Test 'not tagged' as reply. */ + reply = "00"; + strcpy (packet.data (), reply.c_str ()); + /* Because the byte is 00, is_tagged should be set to false. */ + is_tagged = true; + SELF_CHECK (check_is_address_tagged_reply (&remote, packet, is_tagged) == + true); + SELF_CHECK (is_tagged == false); + + /* Test an invalid reply (neither 00 nor 01). */ + reply = "04"; + strcpy (packet.data (), reply.c_str ()); + /* Because the byte is invalid is_tagged must not change. */ + is_tagged = false; + SELF_CHECK (check_is_address_tagged_reply (&remote, packet, is_tagged) == + false); + SELF_CHECK (is_tagged == false); + + /* Test malformed reply of incorrect length. */ + reply = "0104A590001234006"; + strcpy (packet.data (), reply.c_str ()); + /* Because this is a malformed reply is_tagged must not change. */ + is_tagged = false; + SELF_CHECK (check_is_address_tagged_reply (&remote, packet, is_tagged) == + false); + SELF_CHECK (is_tagged == false); + + /* Test empty reply. */ + reply = ""; + strcpy (packet.data (), reply.c_str ()); + /* is_tagged must not change, hence it's tested too. */ + is_tagged = true; + /* On the previous tests, qIsAddressTagged packet was auto detected and set + as supported. But an empty reply means the packet is unsupported, so for + testing the empty reply the support is reset to unknown state, otherwise + packet_ok will complain. */ + remote.m_features.m_protocol_packets[PACKET_qIsAddressTagged].support = + PACKET_SUPPORT_UNKNOWN; + SELF_CHECK (check_is_address_tagged_reply (&remote, packet, is_tagged) == + false); + SELF_CHECK (is_tagged == true); } static void