From: Zhao Mengmeng Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 01:17:09 +0000 (+0800) Subject: sched_ext: Replace scx_next_task_picked() with switch_class() in comment X-Git-Tag: v6.13-rc1~164^2 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=6b8950ef993bcf198d4a80cde0b2da805b75ed70;p=thirdparty%2Fkernel%2Flinux.git sched_ext: Replace scx_next_task_picked() with switch_class() in comment scx_next_task_picked() has been replaced with siwtch_class(), but comment is still referencing old one, so replace it. Signed-off-by: Zhao Mengmeng Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo --- diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c index 5081fbdab74d0..3c4a94e4258f0 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c @@ -2759,7 +2759,7 @@ static int balance_one(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev) * If the previous sched_class for the current CPU was not SCX, * notify the BPF scheduler that it again has control of the * core. This callback complements ->cpu_release(), which is - * emitted in scx_next_task_picked(). + * emitted in switch_class(). */ if (SCX_HAS_OP(cpu_acquire)) SCX_CALL_OP(0, cpu_acquire, cpu_of(rq), NULL); @@ -6073,7 +6073,7 @@ static void kick_cpus_irq_workfn(struct irq_work *irq_work) if (cpu != cpu_of(this_rq)) { /* * Pairs with smp_store_release() issued by this CPU in - * scx_next_task_picked() on the resched path. + * switch_class() on the resched path. * * We busy-wait here to guarantee that no other task can * be scheduled on our core before the target CPU has