From: Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz@apache.org>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 01:02:50 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: My thoughts on mod_cache being non-experimental.
X-Git-Tag: pre_ajp_proxy~1697
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=751a2987efe083fdccc0315d7c75bdc7f3954958;p=thirdparty%2Fapache%2Fhttpd.git

My thoughts on mod_cache being non-experimental.


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk@99841 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
---

diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS
index 85f156852da..92c791d3bd5 100644
--- a/STATUS
+++ b/STATUS
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 APACHE 2.1 STATUS:                                              -*-text-*-
-Last modified at [$Date: 2003/05/15 00:59:15 $]
+Last modified at [$Date: 2003/05/15 01:02:50 $]
 
 Release [NOTE that only Alpha/Beta releases occur in 2.1 development]:
 
@@ -29,6 +29,11 @@ CURRENT VOTES:
       status (keep issues noted below in EXPERIMENTAL MODULES as
       items to be addressed as a supported module).
       +1: jim, stoddard
+      -0: jerenkrantz
+
+      jerenkrantz: There are a slew of RFC compliance bugs filed in Bugzilla
+                   for mod_cache (see 'RFC 2616 violations' below).  I think
+                   fixing them is a pre-requisite before it isn't experimental.
 
     * httpd-std.conf and friends