From: Steve Murphy <murf@digium.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 22:40:13 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: After reconsidering, with respect to 13409, ast_cdr_detach should be OK, better in... 
X-Git-Tag: 1.4.22-rc3~9
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=84800b8fb00d6e866a714b905787bcfb85b49de0;p=thirdparty%2Fasterisk.git

After reconsidering, with respect to 13409, ast_cdr_detach should be OK, better in fact, than ast_cdr_free, which generates lots of useless warnings that will undoubtably generate complaints.

git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4@140690 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
---

diff --git a/main/channel.c b/main/channel.c
index 3bbccff7cd..68590d5b12 100644
--- a/main/channel.c
+++ b/main/channel.c
@@ -1279,7 +1279,7 @@ void ast_channel_free(struct ast_channel *chan)
 	ast_jb_destroy(chan);
 
 	if (chan->cdr) {
-		ast_cdr_free(chan->cdr);
+		ast_cdr_detach(chan->cdr);
 		chan->cdr = NULL;
 	}