From: Juzhe-Zhong <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 06:01:26 +0000 (+0800)
Subject: RISC-V Regression: Fix FAIL of bb-slp-68.c for RVV
X-Git-Tag: basepoints/gcc-15~5512
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=8544efd6d4aea46656c37b0e002503616f09edfc;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git

RISC-V Regression: Fix FAIL of bb-slp-68.c for RVV

Like comment said, this test failed on 64 bytes vector.
Both RVV and GCN has 64 bytes vector.

So it's more reasonable to use vect512.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-68.c: Use vect512.
---

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-68.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-68.c
index e7573a14933e..2dd3d8ee90c6 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-68.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-68.c
@@ -20,4 +20,4 @@ void foo ()
 
 /* We want to have the store group split into 4, 2, 4 when using 32byte vectors.
    Unfortunately it does not work when 64-byte vectors are available.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "from scalars" "slp2" { xfail amdgcn-*-* } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "from scalars" "slp2" { xfail vect512 } } } */