From: Heikki Linnakangas Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 13:08:09 +0000 (+0300) Subject: Rephrase a few comments for clarity. X-Git-Tag: REL9_6_10~25 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=8b1d2685b82fd0ab09c2ba36081e53248c3b09cb;p=thirdparty%2Fpostgresql.git Rephrase a few comments for clarity. I was confused by what "intended to be parallel serially" meant, until Robert Haas and David G. Johnston explained it. Rephrase the comment to make it more clear, using David's suggested wording. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1fec9022-41e8-e484-70ce-2179b08c2092%40iki.fi --- diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeSeqscan.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeSeqscan.c index 00bf3a58b1a..a8d3194611f 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/nodeSeqscan.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeSeqscan.c @@ -65,8 +65,8 @@ SeqNext(SeqScanState *node) if (scandesc == NULL) { /* - * We reach here if the scan is not parallel, or if we're executing a - * scan that was intended to be parallel serially. + * We reach here if the scan is not parallel, or if we're serially + * executing a scan that was planned to be parallel. */ scandesc = heap_beginscan(node->ss.ss_currentRelation, estate->es_snapshot,