From: Alok Tiwari Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2025 08:18:48 +0000 (-0700) Subject: RDMA/bnxt_re: Fix incorrect errno used in function comments X-Git-Tag: v6.18-rc1~102^2~7 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=9b9e32f75aa3d257e3ee3ab0a0f9ad5fbfb298af;p=thirdparty%2Fkernel%2Fstable.git RDMA/bnxt_re: Fix incorrect errno used in function comments The function comments in qplib_rcfw.c mention -ETIMEOUT as a possible return value. However, the correct errno is -ETIMEDOUT. Update the comments to reflect the proper return value to avoid confusion for developers and users referring to the code. Signed-off-by: Alok Tiwari Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250921081854.1059094-1-alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky --- diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_rcfw.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_rcfw.c index 5e34395472c5b..295a9610f3e67 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_rcfw.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_rcfw.c @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static int __wait_for_resp(struct bnxt_qplib_rcfw *rcfw, u16 cookie) * wait for command completion. Maximum holding interval is 8 second. * * Returns: - * -ETIMEOUT if command is not completed in specific time interval. + * -ETIMEDOUT if command is not completed in specific time interval. * 0 if command is completed by firmware. */ static int __block_for_resp(struct bnxt_qplib_rcfw *rcfw, u16 cookie) @@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ static int __send_message(struct bnxt_qplib_rcfw *rcfw, * This function can not be called from non-sleepable context. * * Returns: - * -ETIMEOUT if command is not completed in specific time interval. + * -ETIMEDOUT if command is not completed in specific time interval. * 0 if command is completed by firmware. */ static int __poll_for_resp(struct bnxt_qplib_rcfw *rcfw, u16 cookie)