From: Bartosz Golaszewski Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 10:12:29 +0000 (+0100) Subject: gpiolib: don't use gpiochip_get_direction() when registering a chip X-Git-Tag: v6.15-rc1~179^2~56 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=9becde08f1bc2857cd66f847eca2aaec3fc05c21;p=thirdparty%2Fkernel%2Flinux.git gpiolib: don't use gpiochip_get_direction() when registering a chip During chip registration we should neither check the return value of gc->get_direction() nor hold the SRCU lock when calling it. The former is because pin controllers may have pins set to alternate functions and return errors from their get_direction() callbacks. That's alright - we should default to the safe INPUT state and not bail-out. The latter is not needed because we haven't registered the chip yet so there's nothing to protect against dynamic removal. In fact: we currently hit a lockdep splat. Revert to calling the gc->get_direction() callback directly and *not* checking its value. Fixes: 9d846b1aebbe ("gpiolib: check the return value of gpio_chip::get_direction()") Fixes: e623c4303ed1 ("gpiolib: sanitize the return value of gpio_chip::get_direction()") Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/81f890fc-6688-42f0-9756-567efc8bb97a@samsung.com/ Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250226-retval-fixes-v2-1-c8dc57182441@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski --- diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c index 1b4af0f97e5a6..9de28bc20b20a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c @@ -1087,24 +1087,19 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data, desc->gdev = gdev; - if (gc->get_direction && gpiochip_line_is_valid(gc, desc_index)) { - ret = gpiochip_get_direction(gc, desc_index); - if (ret < 0) - /* - * FIXME: Bail-out here once all GPIO drivers - * are updated to not return errors in - * situations that can be considered normal - * operation. - */ - dev_warn(&gdev->dev, - "%s: get_direction failed: %d\n", - __func__, ret); - - assign_bit(FLAG_IS_OUT, &desc->flags, !ret); - } else { + /* + * We would typically want to use gpiochip_get_direction() here + * but we must not check the return value and bail-out as pin + * controllers can have pins configured to alternate functions + * and return -EINVAL. Also: there's no need to take the SRCU + * lock here. + */ + if (gc->get_direction && gpiochip_line_is_valid(gc, desc_index)) + assign_bit(FLAG_IS_OUT, &desc->flags, + !gc->get_direction(gc, desc_index)); + else assign_bit(FLAG_IS_OUT, &desc->flags, !gc->direction_input); - } } ret = of_gpiochip_add(gc);