From: Gavin Shan Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 06:42:32 +0000 (+0800) Subject: arm64: numa: Don't check node against MAX_NUMNODES X-Git-Tag: v6.0-rc1~203^2~10^2~1 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=9e26cac5f82b2cce43d98ffd8382ebd858fae7e8;p=thirdparty%2Flinux.git arm64: numa: Don't check node against MAX_NUMNODES When the NUMA nodes are sorted by checking ACPI SRAT (GICC AFFINITY) sub-table, it's impossible for acpi_map_pxm_to_node() to return any value, which is greater than or equal to MAX_NUMNODES. Lets drop the unnecessary check in acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(). No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220718064232.3464373-1-gshan@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon --- diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c index fdfecf0991ced..e51535a5f939a 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ void __init acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa) pxm = pa->proximity_domain; node = acpi_map_pxm_to_node(pxm); - if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE || node >= MAX_NUMNODES) { + if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) { pr_err("SRAT: Too many proximity domains %d\n", pxm); bad_srat(); return;