From: Philip Herron Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:32:43 +0000 (+0000) Subject: gccrs: fix ICE in borrows to invalid expressions X-Git-Tag: basepoints/gcc-16~957 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a362f8a7d78da919d3e8ad5d924109a3c1521131;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git gccrs: fix ICE in borrows to invalid expressions We need to check if the borrowed value is valid before creating the reference type. Otherwise this will lead to an ICE. Fixes Rust-GCC#3140 gcc/rust/ChangeLog: * typecheck/rust-hir-type-check-expr.cc (TypeCheckExpr::visit): check for error * typecheck/rust-tyty-call.cc (TypeCheckCallExpr::visit): likewise and remove debug error gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * rust/compile/issue-3046.rs: remove old error message * rust/compile/nr2/exclude: nr2 cant handle this * rust/compile/issue-3140.rs: New test. Signed-off-by: Philip Herron --- diff --git a/gcc/rust/typecheck/rust-hir-type-check-expr.cc b/gcc/rust/typecheck/rust-hir-type-check-expr.cc index 5a96c359d7c..2ea8b4127e6 100644 --- a/gcc/rust/typecheck/rust-hir-type-check-expr.cc +++ b/gcc/rust/typecheck/rust-hir-type-check-expr.cc @@ -1366,6 +1366,8 @@ void TypeCheckExpr::visit (HIR::BorrowExpr &expr) { TyTy::BaseType *resolved_base = TypeCheckExpr::Resolve (expr.get_expr ()); + if (resolved_base->is ()) + return; // In Rust this is valid because of DST's // diff --git a/gcc/rust/typecheck/rust-tyty-call.cc b/gcc/rust/typecheck/rust-tyty-call.cc index 5fea34de40a..2e0830e4ada 100644 --- a/gcc/rust/typecheck/rust-tyty-call.cc +++ b/gcc/rust/typecheck/rust-tyty-call.cc @@ -140,13 +140,8 @@ TypeCheckCallExpr::visit (FnType &type) { location_t arg_locus = argument->get_locus (); auto argument_expr_tyty = Resolver::TypeCheckExpr::Resolve (*argument); - if (argument_expr_tyty->get_kind () == TyTy::TypeKind::ERROR) - { - rust_error_at ( - argument->get_locus (), - "failed to resolve type for argument expr in CallExpr"); - return; - } + if (argument_expr_tyty->is ()) + return; // it might be a variadic function if (i < type.num_params ()) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/rust/compile/issue-3046.rs b/gcc/testsuite/rust/compile/issue-3046.rs index c982cc98f58..f0c72a3cef4 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/rust/compile/issue-3046.rs +++ b/gcc/testsuite/rust/compile/issue-3046.rs @@ -12,12 +12,10 @@ fn test(v: LOption) -> Res { return Res::BAD; } - fn main() { // Should be: // test(LOption::Some(2)); - // + // test(LOption(2)); // { dg-error "expected function, tuple struct or tuple variant, found enum" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } - // { dg-error "failed to resolve type for argument expr in CallExpr" "" { target *-*-* } .-2 } } diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/rust/compile/issue-3140.rs b/gcc/testsuite/rust/compile/issue-3140.rs new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..dcf86db5616 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/rust/compile/issue-3140.rs @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +enum State { + Succeeded, + Failed, +} + +fn print_on_failure(state: &State) { + let mut num = 0; + match *state { + // error: expected unit struct, unit variant or constant, found tuple + // variant `State::Failed` + State::Failed => { + num = 1; + } + State::Succeeded => { + num = 2; + } + _ => (), + } +} + +fn main() { + let b = State::Failed(1); + // { dg-error "expected function, tuple struct or tuple variant, found struct .State." "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } + + print_on_failure(&b); + // { dg-error "cannot find value .b. in this scope" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } +} diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/rust/compile/nr2/exclude b/gcc/testsuite/rust/compile/nr2/exclude index 945a697f677..e7344ed0d59 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/rust/compile/nr2/exclude +++ b/gcc/testsuite/rust/compile/nr2/exclude @@ -195,4 +195,5 @@ issue-266.rs additional-trait-bounds2.rs auto_traits2.rs auto_traits3.rs +issue-3140.rs # please don't delete the trailing newline