From: Mykyta Yatsenko Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 13:21:05 +0000 (+0000) Subject: selftests/bpf: Align kfuncs renamed in bpf tree X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a4d31f451d5be2a65cfe8459808948071e9b54a0;p=thirdparty%2Flinux.git selftests/bpf: Align kfuncs renamed in bpf tree bpf_task_work_schedule_resume() and bpf_task_work_schedule_signal() have been renamed in bpf tree to bpf_task_work_schedule_resume_impl() and bpf_task_work_schedule_signal_impl() accordingly. There are few uses of these kfuncs in selftests that are not in bpf tree, so that when we port [1] into bpf-next, those BPF programs will not compile. This patch aligns those remaining callsites with the kfunc renaming. It should go on top of [1] when applying on bpf-next. 1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251104-implv2-v3-0-4772b9ae0e06@meta.com/ Signed-off-by: Mykyta Yatsenko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251105132105.597344-1-mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/file_reader.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/file_reader.c index 166c3ac6957df..4d756b6235579 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/file_reader.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/file_reader.c @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ int on_open_validate_file_read(void *c) err = 1; return 0; } - bpf_task_work_schedule_signal(task, &work->tw, &arrmap, task_work_callback, NULL); + bpf_task_work_schedule_signal_impl(task, &work->tw, &arrmap, task_work_callback, NULL); return 0; } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_async_cb_context.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_async_cb_context.c index 96ff6749168bf..7efa9521105e1 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_async_cb_context.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_async_cb_context.c @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ int task_work_non_sleepable_prog(void *ctx) if (!task) return 0; - bpf_task_work_schedule_resume(task, &val->tw, &task_work_map, task_work_cb, NULL); + bpf_task_work_schedule_resume_impl(task, &val->tw, &task_work_map, task_work_cb, NULL); return 0; } @@ -176,6 +176,6 @@ int task_work_sleepable_prog(void *ctx) if (!task) return 0; - bpf_task_work_schedule_resume(task, &val->tw, &task_work_map, task_work_cb, NULL); + bpf_task_work_schedule_resume_impl(task, &val->tw, &task_work_map, task_work_cb, NULL); return 0; }