From: Benno Schulenberg Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 15:11:47 +0000 (+0200) Subject: manual: replace an obsolete collation example with a valid one X-Git-Tag: glibc-2.33~394 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a5177499e46b448e1243a5a9007e34ea50684b28;p=thirdparty%2Fglibc.git manual: replace an obsolete collation example with a valid one In the Spanish language, the digraph "ll" has not been considered a separate letter since 1994: https://www.rae.es/consultas/exclusion-de-ch-y-ll-del-abecedario Since January 1998 (commit 49891c106244888123557fca7fddda4fa1f96b1d), glibc's locale data no longer specifies "ch" and "ll" as separate collation elements. So, it's better to not use "ll" in an example. Also, the Czech "ch" is a better example as it collates in a more surprising place. --- diff --git a/manual/string.texi b/manual/string.texi index 23f516439a2..ad11519377a 100644 --- a/manual/string.texi +++ b/manual/string.texi @@ -1422,9 +1422,9 @@ This is an obsolete alias for @code{memcmp}, derived from BSD. In some locales, the conventions for lexicographic ordering differ from the strict numeric ordering of character codes. For example, in Spanish most glyphs with diacritical marks such as accents are not considered -distinct letters for the purposes of collation. On the other hand, the -two-character sequence @samp{ll} is treated as a single letter that is -collated immediately after @samp{l}. +distinct letters for the purposes of collation. On the other hand, in +Czech the two-character sequence @samp{ch} is treated as a single letter +that is collated between @samp{h} and @samp{i}. You can use the functions @code{strcoll} and @code{strxfrm} (declared in the headers file @file{string.h}) and @code{wcscoll} and @code{wcsxfrm}