From: Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:23:51 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: Unbreak legacy syntax "COMMENT ON RULE x IS y", with no relation name.
X-Git-Tag: REL9_1_RC1~30
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a60c16db5f36562df571d36fcacbbed33fd40bd4;p=thirdparty%2Fpostgresql.git

Unbreak legacy syntax "COMMENT ON RULE x IS y", with no relation name.

check_object_ownership() isn't happy about the null relation pointer.
We could fix it there, but this seems more future-proof.
---

diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/objectaddress.c b/src/backend/catalog/objectaddress.c
index bf25091582f..3925b8ec95c 100644
--- a/src/backend/catalog/objectaddress.c
+++ b/src/backend/catalog/objectaddress.c
@@ -463,6 +463,11 @@ get_object_address_relobject(ObjectType objtype, List *objname, Relation *relp)
 		address.classId = RewriteRelationId;
 		address.objectId = get_rewrite_oid_without_relid(depname, &reloid);
 		address.objectSubId = 0;
+
+		/*
+		 * Caller is expecting to get back the relation, even though we
+		 * didn't end up using it to find the rule.
+		 */
 		relation = heap_open(reloid, AccessShareLock);
 	}
 	else