From: Alex Rousskov Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 18:16:08 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Annotate PoolMalloc memory in valgrind builds (#1946) X-Git-Tag: SQUID_7_0_1~37 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=aacc917f47dcd9fd330729f3a28a0582bb14075d;p=thirdparty%2Fsquid.git Annotate PoolMalloc memory in valgrind builds (#1946) MemPoolMalloc code (i.e. memory_pools code used by default) was missing VALGRIND_MAKE_MEM_*() calls. Similar calls do exist in MemPoolChunked code (i.e. code enabled by setting MEMPOOLS environment variable to 1). Even with these markings, "memory_pools on" configuration is still not quite compatible with Valgrind leak reporting suppressions: In some cases, Valgrind may still incorrectly suppress leak reporting (or report leaks that should have been suppressed) because Valgrind associates leak suppressions with memory _allocators_ while buggy code may leak memory allocated by others. The long-term solution (if it exists) requires upgrading these markings to VALGRIND_MEMPOOL_*() API targeting memory pools, but that requires a serious effort, especially when dealing with MemPoolChunked complexities. The added markings help detect non-leak violations and improve PoolMalloc/MemPoolChunked code symmetry. --- diff --git a/src/mem/PoolMalloc.cc b/src/mem/PoolMalloc.cc index 7a33eab94c..d361f4b5c2 100644 --- a/src/mem/PoolMalloc.cc +++ b/src/mem/PoolMalloc.cc @@ -31,6 +31,10 @@ MemPoolMalloc::allocate() if (obj) { --meter.idle; ++countSavedAllocs; + if (doZero) + (void)VALGRIND_MAKE_MEM_DEFINED(obj, objectSize); + else + (void)VALGRIND_MAKE_MEM_UNDEFINED(obj, objectSize); } else { if (doZero) obj = xcalloc(1, objectSize); @@ -52,6 +56,7 @@ MemPoolMalloc::deallocate(void *obj) } else { if (doZero) memset(obj, 0, objectSize); + (void)VALGRIND_MAKE_MEM_NOACCESS(obj, objectSize); ++meter.idle; freelist.push(obj); }