From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 23:12:46 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: testsuite: Fix up new51.C test on various targets [PR108533]
X-Git-Tag: basepoints/gcc-14~1870
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=aba6416e95ab4138a0ecab0fd51e7e9329d74a45;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git

testsuite: Fix up new51.C test on various targets [PR108533]

The test fails on targets where size_t is not unsigned long
due to extra diagnostics.

As the testcase is tested in C++98 too, I'm not using decltype (sizeof 0)
but __SIZE_TYPE__.

2023-01-25  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	PR c++/107329
	PR testsuite/108533
	* g++.dg/init/new51.C (size_t): New typedef.
	(RexxClass::operator new, RexxClass::operator delete): Use size_t
	instead of unsigned long.
---

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/new51.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/new51.C
index d8b336476d93..89c0f87f2020 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/new51.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/new51.C
@@ -1,9 +1,10 @@
 // PR c++/107329
 
+typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t;
 struct RexxClass {
-  void *operator new(unsigned long, unsigned long, const char *, RexxClass *,
+  void *operator new(size_t, size_t, const char *, RexxClass *,
                      RexxClass *);
-  void operator delete(void *, unsigned long, const char *, RexxClass *,
+  void operator delete(void *, size_t, const char *, RexxClass *,
                        RexxClass *);
   RexxClass();
 };