From: Eric Dumazet Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 16:18:55 +0000 (-0800) Subject: net/sysctl: avoid two synchronize_rcu() calls X-Git-Tag: v5.18-rc1~136^2~241 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=b3483bc7a1f2673b35331e60668104ba2be46510;p=thirdparty%2Flinux.git net/sysctl: avoid two synchronize_rcu() calls Both rps_sock_flow_sysctl() and flow_limit_cpu_sysctl() are using synchronize_rcu() right before freeing memory either by vfree() or kfree() They can switch to kvfree_rcu(ptr) and kfree_rcu(ptr) to benefit from asynchronous mode, instead of blocking the current thread. Note that kvfree_rcu(ptr) and kfree_rcu(ptr) eventually can have to use synchronize_rcu() in some memory pressure cases. Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- diff --git a/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c b/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c index dbeb8ecbcd98f..7123fe7feeac6 100644 --- a/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c +++ b/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c @@ -103,8 +103,7 @@ static int rps_sock_flow_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table, int write, if (orig_sock_table) { static_branch_dec(&rps_needed); static_branch_dec(&rfs_needed); - synchronize_rcu(); - vfree(orig_sock_table); + kvfree_rcu(orig_sock_table); } } } @@ -142,8 +141,7 @@ static int flow_limit_cpu_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table, int write, lockdep_is_held(&flow_limit_update_mutex)); if (cur && !cpumask_test_cpu(i, mask)) { RCU_INIT_POINTER(sd->flow_limit, NULL); - synchronize_rcu(); - kfree(cur); + kfree_rcu(cur); } else if (!cur && cpumask_test_cpu(i, mask)) { cur = kzalloc_node(len, GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(i));