From: Yu Kuai Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 11:57:43 +0000 (+0800) Subject: block: fix false warning in bdev_count_inflight_rw() X-Git-Tag: v6.16-rc4~18^2 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c007062188d8e402c294117db53a24b2bed2b83f;p=thirdparty%2Fkernel%2Fstable.git block: fix false warning in bdev_count_inflight_rw() While bdev_count_inflight is interating all cpus, if some IOs are issued from traversed cpu and then completed from the cpu that is not traversed yet: cpu0 cpu1 bdev_count_inflight //for_each_possible_cpu // cpu0 is 0 infliht += 0 // issue a io blk_account_io_start // cpu0 inflight ++ cpu2 // the io is done blk_account_io_done // cpu2 inflight -- // cpu 1 is 0 inflight += 0 // cpu2 is -1 inflight += -1 ... In this case, the total inflight will be -1, causing lots of false warning. Fix the problem by removing the warning. Noted there is still a valid warning for nvme-mpath(From Yi) that is not fixed yet. Fixes: f5482ee5edb9 ("block: WARN if bdev inflight counter is negative") Reported-by: Yi Zhang Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/aFtUXy-lct0WxY2w@mozart.vkv.me/T/#mae89155a5006463d0a21a4a2c35ae0034b26a339 Reported-and-tested-by: Calvin Owens Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/aFtUXy-lct0WxY2w@mozart.vkv.me/T/#m1d935a00070bf95055d0ac84e6075158b08acaef Reported-by: Dave Chinner Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/aFuypjqCXo9-5_En@dread.disaster.area/ Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250626115743.1641443-1-yukuai3@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c index 8171a6bc3210f..c26733f6324b2 100644 --- a/block/genhd.c +++ b/block/genhd.c @@ -128,23 +128,27 @@ static void part_stat_read_all(struct block_device *part, static void bdev_count_inflight_rw(struct block_device *part, unsigned int inflight[2], bool mq_driver) { + int write = 0; + int read = 0; int cpu; if (mq_driver) { blk_mq_in_driver_rw(part, inflight); - } else { - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { - inflight[READ] += part_stat_local_read_cpu( - part, in_flight[READ], cpu); - inflight[WRITE] += part_stat_local_read_cpu( - part, in_flight[WRITE], cpu); - } + return; + } + + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { + read += part_stat_local_read_cpu(part, in_flight[READ], cpu); + write += part_stat_local_read_cpu(part, in_flight[WRITE], cpu); } - if (WARN_ON_ONCE((int)inflight[READ] < 0)) - inflight[READ] = 0; - if (WARN_ON_ONCE((int)inflight[WRITE] < 0)) - inflight[WRITE] = 0; + /* + * While iterating all CPUs, some IOs may be issued from a CPU already + * traversed and complete on a CPU that has not yet been traversed, + * causing the inflight number to be negative. + */ + inflight[READ] = read > 0 ? read : 0; + inflight[WRITE] = write > 0 ? write : 0; } /**