From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 10:34:23 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: locking/qspinlock: Use smp_cond_load_relaxed() to wait for next node
X-Git-Tag: v4.18-rc1~167^2~45
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c131a198c497db436b558ac5e9a140cdcb91b304;p=thirdparty%2Fkernel%2Flinux.git

locking/qspinlock: Use smp_cond_load_relaxed() to wait for next node

When a locker reaches the head of the queue and takes the lock, a
concurrent locker may enqueue and force the lock holder to spin
whilst its node->next field is initialised. Rather than open-code
a READ_ONCE/cpu_relax() loop, this can be implemented using
smp_cond_load_relaxed() instead.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: boqun.feng@gmail.com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1524738868-31318-10-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---

diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
index 56af1fa9874d8..d6c3b029bd935 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
@@ -483,10 +483,8 @@ locked:
 	/*
 	 * contended path; wait for next if not observed yet, release.
 	 */
-	if (!next) {
-		while (!(next = READ_ONCE(node->next)))
-			cpu_relax();
-	}
+	if (!next)
+		next = smp_cond_load_relaxed(&node->next, (VAL));
 
 	arch_mcs_spin_unlock_contended(&next->locked);
 	pv_kick_node(lock, next);