From: Yongpeng Yang Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 08:45:34 +0000 (+0800) Subject: f2fs: fix fsck inconsistency caused by FGGC of node block X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c3e238bd1f56993f205ef83889d406dfeaf717a8;p=thirdparty%2Fkernel%2Flinux.git f2fs: fix fsck inconsistency caused by FGGC of node block During FGGC node block migration, fsck may incorrectly treat the migrated node block as fsync-written data. The reproduction scenario: root@vm:/mnt/f2fs# seq 1 2048 | xargs -n 1 ./test_sync // write inline inode and sync root@vm:/mnt/f2fs# rm -f 1 root@vm:/mnt/f2fs# sync root@vm:/mnt/f2fs# f2fs_io gc_range // move data block in sync mode and not write CP SPO, "fsck --dry-run" find inode has already checkpointed but still with DENT_BIT_SHIFT set The root cause is that GC does not clear the dentry mark and fsync mark during node block migration, leading fsck to misinterpret them as user-issued fsync writes. In BGGC mode, node block migration is handled by f2fs_sync_node_pages(), which guarantees the dentry and fsync marks are cleared before writing. This patch move the set/clear of the fsync|dentry marks into __write_node_folio to make the logic clearer, and ensures the fsync|dentry mark is cleared in FGGC. Cc: stable@kernel.org Fixes: da011cc0da8c ("f2fs: move node pages only in victim section during GC") Signed-off-by: Yongpeng Yang Reviewed-by: Chao Yu Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim --- diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c index 630fd3b43a08..c7499cb52745 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c @@ -1727,9 +1727,10 @@ continue_unlock: return last_folio; } -static bool __write_node_folio(struct folio *folio, bool atomic, bool *submitted, - struct writeback_control *wbc, bool do_balance, - enum iostat_type io_type, unsigned int *seq_id) +static bool __write_node_folio(struct folio *folio, bool atomic, bool do_fsync, + bool *submitted, struct writeback_control *wbc, + bool do_balance, enum iostat_type io_type, + unsigned int *seq_id) { struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_F_SB(folio); nid_t nid; @@ -1802,6 +1803,8 @@ static bool __write_node_folio(struct folio *folio, bool atomic, bool *submitted if (atomic && !test_opt(sbi, NOBARRIER)) fio.op_flags |= REQ_PREFLUSH | REQ_FUA; + set_dentry_mark(folio, false); + set_fsync_mark(folio, do_fsync); if (IS_INODE(folio) && (atomic || is_fsync_dnode(folio))) set_dentry_mark(folio, f2fs_need_dentry_mark(sbi, ino_of_node(folio))); @@ -1868,7 +1871,7 @@ static int f2fs_write_single_node_folio(struct folio *node_folio, int sync_mode, goto out_folio; } - if (!__write_node_folio(node_folio, false, NULL, + if (!__write_node_folio(node_folio, false, false, NULL, &wbc, false, FS_GC_NODE_IO, NULL)) err = -EAGAIN; goto release_folio; @@ -1915,6 +1918,7 @@ retry: for (i = 0; i < nr_folios; i++) { struct folio *folio = fbatch.folios[i]; bool submitted = false; + bool do_fsync = false; if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) { f2fs_folio_put(last_folio, false); @@ -1945,11 +1949,8 @@ continue_unlock: f2fs_folio_wait_writeback(folio, NODE, true, true); - set_fsync_mark(folio, 0); - set_dentry_mark(folio, 0); - if (!atomic || folio == last_folio) { - set_fsync_mark(folio, 1); + do_fsync = true; percpu_counter_inc(&sbi->rf_node_block_count); if (IS_INODE(folio)) { if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, @@ -1966,8 +1967,9 @@ continue_unlock: if (!__write_node_folio(folio, atomic && folio == last_folio, - &submitted, wbc, true, - FS_NODE_IO, seq_id)) { + do_fsync, &submitted, + wbc, true, FS_NODE_IO, + seq_id)) { f2fs_folio_put(last_folio, false); folio_batch_release(&fbatch); ret = -EIO; @@ -2167,10 +2169,7 @@ write_node: if (!folio_clear_dirty_for_io(folio)) goto continue_unlock; - set_fsync_mark(folio, 0); - set_dentry_mark(folio, 0); - - if (!__write_node_folio(folio, false, &submitted, + if (!__write_node_folio(folio, false, false, &submitted, wbc, do_balance, io_type, NULL)) { folio_batch_release(&fbatch); ret = -EIO;