From: Bob Wilson <bob.wilson@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:14:14 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: * gcc.dg/const-elim-1.c: xfail for xtensa.
X-Git-Tag: releases/gcc-4.0.0~9654
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c4909065ce13cbffa683735a62711c0d29eceb52;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git

* gcc.dg/const-elim-1.c: xfail for xtensa.

From-SVN: r78864
---

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
index 42e02ae50e84..0724e1340e76 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2004-03-03  Bob Wilson  <bob.wilson@acm.org>
+
+	* gcc.dg/const-elim-1.c: xfail for xtensa.
+
 2004-03-01  Mark Mitchell  <mark@codesourcery.com>
 
 	PR c++/14369
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/const-elim-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/const-elim-1.c
index 58c950df03d2..b68abfc917cd 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/const-elim-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/const-elim-1.c
@@ -7,10 +7,10 @@
 
 /* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O2 -std=c99" } */
-/* This test fails on ARM cores because we use a block move to
+/* This test fails on ARM and Xtensa cores because we use a block move to
    initialize "S" in test2, and GCC is not clever enough to eliminate
    the block move.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "L\\\$?C\[^A-Z\]" { xfail arm-*-* strongarm-*-* xscale-*-* powerpc*-*-aix* } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "L\\\$?C\[^A-Z\]" { xfail arm-*-* strongarm-*-* xscale-*-* powerpc*-*-aix* xtensa-*-* } } } */
 
 #define I (__extension__ 1.0iF)