From: Minghao Chi Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 08:30:00 +0000 (+0000) Subject: ASoC: fsl: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync X-Git-Tag: v5.19-rc1~152^2~2^2~127 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c721905c54d913db0102973dbcdfb48d91146a2d;p=thirdparty%2Flinux.git ASoC: fsl: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate for simplifing code Reported-by: Zeal Robot Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi Acked-by: Shengjiu Wang Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220412083000.2532711-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c index ed444e8f1d6bf..1a2bdf8e76f00 100644 --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c @@ -1050,11 +1050,9 @@ static int fsl_esai_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) goto err_pm_disable; } - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev); - if (ret < 0) { - pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev); + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(&pdev->dev); + if (ret < 0) goto err_pm_get_sync; - } ret = fsl_esai_hw_init(esai_priv); if (ret)