From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 07:35:53 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: [Ada] Deal with derived record types in Has_Compatible_Representation
X-Git-Tag: basepoints/gcc-14~6678
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=d678717ab233610588ae15fcddeb20b39ac7daf5;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git

[Ada] Deal with derived record types in Has_Compatible_Representation

More precisely, untagged record types, as tagged record types are already
handled by the predicate.  If the derived type has not been given its own
representation clause, then the representations are the same.

gcc/ada/

	* sem_ch13.adb (Has_Compatible_Representation): Return true for
	derived untagged record types without representation clause.
---

diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_ch13.adb b/gcc/ada/sem_ch13.adb
index 93f5e452bd4..ac94de7e84a 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/sem_ch13.adb
+++ b/gcc/ada/sem_ch13.adb
@@ -13539,6 +13539,16 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
          if Is_Packed (T1) /= Is_Packed (T2) then
             return False;
 
+         --  If the operand type is derived from the target type and no clause
+         --  has been given after the derivation, then the representations are
+         --  the same since the derived type inherits that of the parent type.
+
+         elsif Is_Derived_Type (T2)
+           and then Etype (T2) = T1
+           and then not Has_Record_Rep_Clause (T2)
+         then
+            return True;
+
          --  Otherwise we must check components. Typ2 maybe a constrained
          --  subtype with fewer components, so we compare the components
          --  of the base types.