From: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 09:27:17 +0000 (+0800)
Subject: time/kunit: Use correct format specifier
X-Git-Tag: v6.9-rc1~203^2~41
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e0a1284b293bdf91a68a6d1a0479ad476d0d8ec2;p=thirdparty%2Fkernel%2Flinux.git

time/kunit: Use correct format specifier

'days' is a s64 (from div_s64), and so should use a %lld specifier.

This was found by extending KUnit's assertion macros to use gcc's
__printf attribute.

Fixes: 276010551664 ("time: Improve performance of time64_to_tm()")
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240221092728.1281499-5-davidgow@google.com
---

diff --git a/kernel/time/time_test.c b/kernel/time/time_test.c
index ca058c8af6baf..3e5d422dd15cb 100644
--- a/kernel/time/time_test.c
+++ b/kernel/time/time_test.c
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static void time64_to_tm_test_date_range(struct kunit *test)
 
 		days = div_s64(secs, 86400);
 
-		#define FAIL_MSG "%05ld/%02d/%02d (%2d) : %ld", \
+		#define FAIL_MSG "%05ld/%02d/%02d (%2d) : %lld", \
 			year, month, mdday, yday, days
 
 		KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, year - 1900, result.tm_year, FAIL_MSG);