From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2025 07:24:09 +0000 (+0200) Subject: 6.14-stable patches X-Git-Tag: v6.12.33~15 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e5fcabb04c360e3aeda86ef25fdf96b5e76444a9;p=thirdparty%2Fkernel%2Fstable-queue.git 6.14-stable patches added patches: orangefs-adjust-counting-code-to-recover-from-665575cf.patch rtc-fix-offset-calculation-for-.start_secs-0.patch rtc-make-rtc_time64_to_tm-support-dates-before-1970.patch --- diff --git a/queue-6.14/orangefs-adjust-counting-code-to-recover-from-665575cf.patch b/queue-6.14/orangefs-adjust-counting-code-to-recover-from-665575cf.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..4250fe66ff --- /dev/null +++ b/queue-6.14/orangefs-adjust-counting-code-to-recover-from-665575cf.patch @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +From hubcap@kernel.org Sat Jun 7 09:09:20 2025 +From: hubcap@kernel.org +Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 11:23:02 -0400 +Subject: orangefs: adjust counting code to recover from 665575cf +To: stable@vger.kernel.org +Cc: Mike Marshall , hubcapsc@gmail.com +Message-ID: <20250604152308.216963-2-hubcap@kernel.org> + +From: Mike Marshall + +A late commit to 6.14-rc7 (665575cf) broke orangefs. This is a several line +adjustment to some counters needed to keep orangefs from deadlocking +when writing page cache data out to the filesystem. + +Signed-off-by: Mike Marshall +Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman +--- + fs/orangefs/inode.c | 9 +++++---- + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) + +--- a/fs/orangefs/inode.c ++++ b/fs/orangefs/inode.c +@@ -32,12 +32,13 @@ static int orangefs_writepage_locked(str + len = i_size_read(inode); + if (PagePrivate(page)) { + wr = (struct orangefs_write_range *)page_private(page); +- WARN_ON(wr->pos >= len); + off = wr->pos; +- if (off + wr->len > len) ++ if ((off + wr->len > len) && (off <= len)) + wlen = len - off; + else + wlen = wr->len; ++ if (wlen == 0) ++ wlen = wr->len; + } else { + WARN_ON(1); + off = page_offset(page); +@@ -46,8 +47,6 @@ static int orangefs_writepage_locked(str + else + wlen = PAGE_SIZE; + } +- /* Should've been handled in orangefs_invalidate_folio. */ +- WARN_ON(off == len || off + wlen > len); + + WARN_ON(wlen == 0); + bvec_set_page(&bv, page, wlen, off % PAGE_SIZE); +@@ -340,6 +339,8 @@ static int orangefs_write_begin(struct f + wr->len += len; + goto okay; + } else { ++ wr->pos = pos; ++ wr->len = len; + ret = orangefs_launder_folio(folio); + if (ret) + return ret; diff --git a/queue-6.14/rtc-fix-offset-calculation-for-.start_secs-0.patch b/queue-6.14/rtc-fix-offset-calculation-for-.start_secs-0.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..b0dcc2d0e9 --- /dev/null +++ b/queue-6.14/rtc-fix-offset-calculation-for-.start_secs-0.patch @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ +From fe9f5f96cfe8b82d0f24cbfa93718925560f4f8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Alexandre Mergnat +Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 12:06:48 +0200 +Subject: rtc: Fix offset calculation for .start_secs < 0 +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit + +From: Alexandre Mergnat + +commit fe9f5f96cfe8b82d0f24cbfa93718925560f4f8d upstream. + +The comparison + + rtc->start_secs > rtc->range_max + +has a signed left-hand side and an unsigned right-hand side. +So the comparison might become true for negative start_secs which is +interpreted as a (possibly very large) positive value. + +As a negative value can never be bigger than an unsigned value +the correct representation of the (mathematical) comparison + + rtc->start_secs > rtc->range_max + +in C is: + + rtc->start_secs >= 0 && rtc->start_secs > rtc->range_max + +Use that to fix the offset calculation currently used in the +rtc-mt6397 driver. + +Fixes: 989515647e783 ("rtc: Add one offset seconds to expand RTC range") +Signed-off-by: Alexandre Mergnat +Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König +Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250428-enable-rtc-v4-2-2b2f7e3f9349@baylibre.com +Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni +Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König +Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman +--- + drivers/rtc/class.c | 2 +- + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) + +--- a/drivers/rtc/class.c ++++ b/drivers/rtc/class.c +@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ static void rtc_device_get_offset(struct + * + * Otherwise the offset seconds should be 0. + */ +- if (rtc->start_secs > rtc->range_max || ++ if ((rtc->start_secs >= 0 && rtc->start_secs > rtc->range_max) || + rtc->start_secs + range_secs - 1 < rtc->range_min) + rtc->offset_secs = rtc->start_secs - rtc->range_min; + else if (rtc->start_secs > rtc->range_min) diff --git a/queue-6.14/rtc-make-rtc_time64_to_tm-support-dates-before-1970.patch b/queue-6.14/rtc-make-rtc_time64_to_tm-support-dates-before-1970.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..b4a42d19a9 --- /dev/null +++ b/queue-6.14/rtc-make-rtc_time64_to_tm-support-dates-before-1970.patch @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ +From 7df4cfef8b351fec3156160bedfc7d6d29de4cce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Alexandre Mergnat +Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 12:06:47 +0200 +Subject: rtc: Make rtc_time64_to_tm() support dates before 1970 +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit + +From: Alexandre Mergnat + +commit 7df4cfef8b351fec3156160bedfc7d6d29de4cce upstream. + +Conversion of dates before 1970 is still relevant today because these +dates are reused on some hardwares to store dates bigger than the +maximal date that is representable in the device's native format. +This prominently and very soon affects the hardware covered by the +rtc-mt6397 driver that can only natively store dates in the interval +1900-01-01 up to 2027-12-31. So to store the date 2028-01-01 00:00:00 +to such a device, rtc_time64_to_tm() must do the right thing for +time=-2208988800. + +Signed-off-by: Alexandre Mergnat +Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König +Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250428-enable-rtc-v4-1-2b2f7e3f9349@baylibre.com +Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni +Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König +Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman +--- + drivers/rtc/lib.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++----- + 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) + +--- a/drivers/rtc/lib.c ++++ b/drivers/rtc/lib.c +@@ -46,24 +46,38 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rtc_year_days); + * rtc_time64_to_tm - converts time64_t to rtc_time. + * + * @time: The number of seconds since 01-01-1970 00:00:00. +- * (Must be positive.) ++ * Works for values since at least 1900 + * @tm: Pointer to the struct rtc_time. + */ + void rtc_time64_to_tm(time64_t time, struct rtc_time *tm) + { +- unsigned int secs; +- int days; ++ int days, secs; + + u64 u64tmp; + u32 u32tmp, udays, century, day_of_century, year_of_century, year, + day_of_year, month, day; + bool is_Jan_or_Feb, is_leap_year; + +- /* time must be positive */ ++ /* ++ * Get days and seconds while preserving the sign to ++ * handle negative time values (dates before 1970-01-01) ++ */ + days = div_s64_rem(time, 86400, &secs); + ++ /* ++ * We need 0 <= secs < 86400 which isn't given for negative ++ * values of time. Fixup accordingly. ++ */ ++ if (secs < 0) { ++ days -= 1; ++ secs += 86400; ++ } ++ + /* day of the week, 1970-01-01 was a Thursday */ + tm->tm_wday = (days + 4) % 7; ++ /* Ensure tm_wday is always positive */ ++ if (tm->tm_wday < 0) ++ tm->tm_wday += 7; + + /* + * The following algorithm is, basically, Proposition 6.3 of Neri +@@ -93,7 +107,7 @@ void rtc_time64_to_tm(time64_t time, str + * thus, is slightly different from [1]. + */ + +- udays = ((u32) days) + 719468; ++ udays = days + 719468; + + u32tmp = 4 * udays + 3; + century = u32tmp / 146097; diff --git a/queue-6.14/series b/queue-6.14/series index a3818dace4..3e106f15f1 100644 --- a/queue-6.14/series +++ b/queue-6.14/series @@ -4,3 +4,6 @@ pinctrl-armada-37xx-set-gpio-output-value-before-setting-direction.patch clk-samsung-correct-clock-summary-for-hsi1-block.patch acpi-cpufreq-fix-nominal_freq-units-to-khz-in-get_max_boost_ratio.patch documentation-acpi-use-all-string-data-node-references.patch +rtc-make-rtc_time64_to_tm-support-dates-before-1970.patch +rtc-fix-offset-calculation-for-.start_secs-0.patch +orangefs-adjust-counting-code-to-recover-from-665575cf.patch