From: Richard Sandiford Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 06:27:12 +0000 (+0000) Subject: combine.c (combine_simplify_rtx): Remove a transformation that relies on an invalid... X-Git-Tag: misc/cutover-cvs2svn~4197 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=ecf9c079e2cf0d25a88746512fa491018a056c24;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git combine.c (combine_simplify_rtx): Remove a transformation that relies on an invalid assumption about rtl... * combine.c (combine_simplify_rtx): Remove a transformation that relies on an invalid assumption about rtl sign-extension semantics. From-SVN: r97941 --- diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog index 8cb7b427bc3d..bd836f3cd152 100644 --- a/gcc/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2005-04-10 Richard Sandiford + + * combine.c (combine_simplify_rtx): Remove a transformation that + relies on an invalid assumption about rtl sign-extension semantics. + 2005-04-10 Richard Sandiford * value-prof.c (tree_divmod_fixed_value_transform): Fix arguments diff --git a/gcc/combine.c b/gcc/combine.c index 313a3d90d235..89866e0fa3d7 100644 --- a/gcc/combine.c +++ b/gcc/combine.c @@ -3768,47 +3768,6 @@ combine_simplify_rtx (rtx x, enum machine_mode op0_mode, int in_dest) SUBST (XEXP (x, 1), temp); } - /* If this is a PLUS, MINUS, or MULT, and the first operand is the - sign extension of a PLUS with a constant, reverse the order of the sign - extension and the addition. Note that this not the same as the original - code, but overflow is undefined for signed values. Also note that the - PLUS will have been partially moved "inside" the sign-extension, so that - the first operand of X will really look like: - (ashiftrt (plus (ashift A C4) C5) C4). - We convert this to - (plus (ashiftrt (ashift A C4) C2) C4) - and replace the first operand of X with that expression. Later parts - of this function may simplify the expression further. - - For example, if we start with (mult (sign_extend (plus A C1)) C2), - we swap the SIGN_EXTEND and PLUS. Later code will apply the - distributive law to produce (plus (mult (sign_extend X) C1) C3). - - We do this to simplify address expressions. */ - - if ((code == PLUS || code == MINUS || code == MULT) - && GET_CODE (XEXP (x, 0)) == ASHIFTRT - && GET_CODE (XEXP (XEXP (x, 0), 0)) == PLUS - && GET_CODE (XEXP (XEXP (XEXP (x, 0), 0), 0)) == ASHIFT - && GET_CODE (XEXP (XEXP (XEXP (XEXP (x, 0), 0), 0), 1)) == CONST_INT - && GET_CODE (XEXP (XEXP (x, 0), 1)) == CONST_INT - && XEXP (XEXP (XEXP (XEXP (x, 0), 0), 0), 1) == XEXP (XEXP (x, 0), 1) - && GET_CODE (XEXP (XEXP (XEXP (x, 0), 0), 1)) == CONST_INT - && (temp = simplify_binary_operation (ASHIFTRT, mode, - XEXP (XEXP (XEXP (x, 0), 0), 1), - XEXP (XEXP (x, 0), 1))) != 0) - { - rtx new - = simplify_shift_const (NULL_RTX, ASHIFT, mode, - XEXP (XEXP (XEXP (XEXP (x, 0), 0), 0), 0), - INTVAL (XEXP (XEXP (x, 0), 1))); - - new = simplify_shift_const (NULL_RTX, ASHIFTRT, mode, new, - INTVAL (XEXP (XEXP (x, 0), 1))); - - SUBST (XEXP (x, 0), simplify_gen_binary (PLUS, mode, new, temp)); - } - /* If this is a simple operation applied to an IF_THEN_ELSE, try applying it to the arms of the IF_THEN_ELSE. This often simplifies things. Check for cases where both arms are testing the same diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog index fea25c4a5ada..59255c0a50c2 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2005-04-10 Richard Sandiford + + * gcc.c-torture/execute/20050410-1.c: New test. + 2005-04-09 Alexandre Oliva * gcc.dg/pr20126.c: New. diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20050410-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20050410-1.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..c4cd85279a97 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20050410-1.c @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +int s = 200; +int __attribute__((noinline)) +foo (void) +{ + return (signed char) (s - 100) - 5; +} +int +main (void) +{ + if (foo () != 95) + abort (); + exit (0); +}