From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:21:43 +0000 (+0000)
Subject:         PR gdb/10884
X-Git-Tag: gdb_7_0_1-2009-12-22-release~2
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f8244fdb7f33df69ce58b3a33f30b23d6d97ebe0;p=thirdparty%2Fbinutils-gdb.git

    PR gdb/10884

        * gdb.mi/var-cmd.c (do_bitfield_tests): New
        (main): Call do_bitfield_tests.
        * gdb.mi/mi-var-cmd.exp: Run the 'bitfield' testcase.
---

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
index 176e683d734..3dd23742acf 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+2009-12-21  Vladimir Prus  <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
+
+	PR gdb/10884
+
+	* gdb.mi/var-cmd.c (do_bitfield_tests): New
+	(main): Call do_bitfield_tests.
+	* gdb.mi/mi-var-cmd.exp: Run the 'bitfield' testcase.
+
 2009-12-21  Jan Kratochvil  <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
 
 	* gdb.base/foll-fork.exp (unpatch child, breakpoint at exit call):
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-var-cmd.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-var-cmd.exp
index 6efb3332d10..4cb2552f7f4 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-var-cmd.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-var-cmd.exp
@@ -577,6 +577,8 @@ proc set_frozen {varobjs flag} {
 mi_prepare_inline_tests $srcfile
 mi_run_inline_test frozen
 
+mi_run_inline_test bitfield
+
 # Since the inline test framework does not really work with
 # function calls, first to inline tests and then do the reminder
 # manually.
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/var-cmd.c b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/var-cmd.c
index 6372f64b5de..bbadc24ba7a 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/var-cmd.c
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/var-cmd.c
@@ -468,6 +468,40 @@ void do_at_tests ()
   /*: END: floating :*/
 }
 
+/* Some header appear to define uint already, so apply some
+   uglification.  Note that without uglification, the compile
+   does not fail, rather, we don't test what we want because
+   something else calls check_typedef on 'uint' already.  */
+typedef unsigned int uint_for_mi_testing;
+
+struct Data {
+  int alloc;
+  uint_for_mi_testing sharable : 4;
+};
+
+/* Accessing a value of a bitfield whose type is a typed used to
+   result in division by zero.  See:
+
+         http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10884
+
+   This tests for this bug.  */
+
+void do_bitfield_tests ()
+{
+  /*: BEGIN: bitfield :*/
+  struct Data d = {0, 3};
+  /*:
+    mi_create_varobj V d "create varobj for Data"
+    mi_list_varobj_children "V" {
+        {"V.alloc" "alloc" "0" "int"}
+        {"V.sharable" "sharable" "0" "unsigned int"}
+    } "list children of Data"
+    mi_check_varobj_value V.sharable 3 "access bitfield"
+    :*/
+  return;
+  /*: END: bitfield :*/  
+}
+
 int
 main (int argc, char *argv [])
 {
@@ -477,6 +511,7 @@ main (int argc, char *argv [])
   do_special_tests ();
   do_frozen_tests ();
   do_at_tests ();
+  do_bitfield_tests ();
   exit (0);
 }