From: Martin Ågren Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 13:15:46 +0000 (+0200) Subject: worktree: rename copy-pasted variable X-Git-Tag: v2.29.0-rc0~12^2~1 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=fb07bd42975bcbfbc29d4a3ef1bff1039a469336;p=thirdparty%2Fgit.git worktree: rename copy-pasted variable As the commit message of 04a3dfb8b5 ("worktree.c: check whether branch is bisected in another worktree", 2016-04-22) indicates, the function `is_worktree_being_bisected()` is based on the older function `is_worktree_being_rebased()`. This heritage can also be seen in the name of the variable where we store our return value: It was never adapted while copy-editing and remains as `found_rebase`. Rename the variable to make clear that we're looking for a bisect(ion), nothing else. Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano --- diff --git a/worktree.c b/worktree.c index f5eb6e7636..6a236d2e72 100644 --- a/worktree.c +++ b/worktree.c @@ -365,15 +365,15 @@ int is_worktree_being_bisected(const struct worktree *wt, const char *target) { struct wt_status_state state; - int found_rebase; + int found_bisect; memset(&state, 0, sizeof(state)); - found_rebase = wt_status_check_bisect(wt, &state) && - state.branch && - starts_with(target, "refs/heads/") && - !strcmp(state.branch, target + strlen("refs/heads/")); + found_bisect = wt_status_check_bisect(wt, &state) && + state.branch && + starts_with(target, "refs/heads/") && + !strcmp(state.branch, target + strlen("refs/heads/")); wt_status_state_free_buffers(&state); - return found_rebase; + return found_bisect; } /*