From: Andrew Boardman <amb@mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 10:27:51 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Misc commentary
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=refs%2Fheads%2Famb%2Freferrals;p=thirdparty%2Fkrb5.git

Misc commentary

git-svn-id: svn://anonsvn.mit.edu/krb5/users/amb/referrals@18547 dc483132-0cff-0310-8789-dd5450dbe970
---

diff --git a/implementation.notes b/implementation.notes
index 7cdf9adea0..22a7912c3f 100644
--- a/implementation.notes
+++ b/implementation.notes
@@ -222,3 +222,9 @@ B if asked, and that the client fallback to the standard
 non-referral-based traversal is the only functional path here.
 
 But is that really the right thing?
+
+misc questions answered:
+=======================
+- should do_traversal code for old-style lookups still be requesting referrals?
+  If so, within what scope should they actually be used?
+  - probably not.  the old traversal code is network-intensive and resilient enough as is.