Gustavo Sousa [Fri, 8 Nov 2024 12:57:16 +0000 (09:57 -0300)]
drm/i915/dmc_wl: Deal with existing references when disabling
It is possible that there are active wakelock references at the time we
are disabling the DMC wakelock mechanism. We need to deal with that in
two ways:
(A) Implement the missing step from Bspec:
The Bspec instructs us to clear any existing wakelock request bit
after disabling the mechanism. That gives a clue that it is okay to
disable while there are locks held and we do not need to wait for
them. However, since the spec is not explicit about it, we need
still to get confirmation with the hardware team. Let's thus
implement the spec and add a TODO note.
(B) Ensure a consistent driver state:
The enable/disable logic would be problematic if the following
sequence of events would happen:
1. Function A calls intel_dmc_wl_get();
2. Some function calls intel_dmc_wl_disable();
3. Some function calls intel_dmc_wl_enable();
4. Function A is done and calls intel_dmc_wl_put().
At (2), the refcount becomes zero and then (4) causes an invalid
decrement to the refcount. That would cause some issues:
- At the time between (3) and (4), function A would think that
the hardware lock is held but it could not be really held
until intel_dmc_wl_get() is called by something else.
- The call made to (4) could cause the refcount to become zero
and consequently the hardware lock to be released while there
could be innocent paths trusting they still have the lock.
To fix that, we need to keep the refcount correctly in sync with
intel_dmc_wl_{get,put}() calls and retake the hardware lock when
enabling the DMC wakelock with a non-zero refcount.
One missing piece left to be handled here is the following scenario:
1. Function A calls intel_dmc_wl_get();
2. Some function calls intel_dmc_wl_disable();
3. Some function calls intel_dmc_wl_enable();
4. Concurrently with (3), function A performs the MMIO in between
setting DMC_WAKELOCK_CFG_ENABLE and asserting the lock with
__intel_dmc_wl_take().
I'm mostly sure this would cause issues future display IPs if DMC
trap implementation was completely removed. We need to check with
the hardware team whether it would be safe to assert the hardware
lock before setting DMC_WAKELOCK_CFG_ENABLE to avoid this scenario.
If not, then we would have to deal with that via software
synchronization.
Gustavo Sousa [Fri, 8 Nov 2024 12:57:15 +0000 (09:57 -0300)]
drm/i915/dmc_wl: Allow simpler syntax for single reg in range tables
Allow simpler syntax for defining entries for single registers in range
tables. That makes them easier to type as well as to read, allowing one
to quickly tell whether a range actually refers to a single register or
a "true range".
Gustavo Sousa [Fri, 8 Nov 2024 12:57:14 +0000 (09:57 -0300)]
drm/i915/dmc_wl: Track registers touched by the DMC
There are extra registers that require the DMC wakelock when specific
dynamic DC states are in place. Those are registers that are touched by
the DMC and require DC exit for proper access. Add the range tables for
them and use the correct one depending on the enabled DC state.
v2:
- Do not look into power domains guts (i.e.
display->power.domains.dc_state). (Jani)
- Come up with better names for variables containing register ranges.
(Luca)
- Keep a copy of dc_state in struct intel_dmc_wl.
- Update commit message for a clearer explanation for the need of
these new tables.
Gustavo Sousa [Fri, 8 Nov 2024 12:57:13 +0000 (09:57 -0300)]
drm/i915/dmc_wl: Rename lnl_wl_range to powered_off_ranges
In an upcoming change, we will add extra range tables for registers that
are touched by the DMC during DC states. The range table that we are
currently using is meant for registers that are powered off during DC
states. As such, let's rename the table to powered_off_ranges and also
add a comment regarding its purpose in the function that uses it.
We will be using more than one range table in
intel_dmc_wl_check_range(). As such, move the logic to a new function
and name it intel_dmc_wl_reg_in_range().
Gustavo Sousa [Fri, 8 Nov 2024 12:57:11 +0000 (09:57 -0300)]
drm/i915/dmc_wl: Use sentinel item for range tables
We are currently using ARRAY_SIZE() to iterate address ranges in
intel_dmc_wl_check_range(). In upcoming changes, we will be using more
than a single table and will extract the range checking logic into a
dedicated function that takes a range table as argument. As we will not
able to use ARRAY_SIZE() then, let's make range tables contain a
sentinel item at the end and use that instead of having to pass the size
as parameter in this future function.
Gustavo Sousa [Fri, 8 Nov 2024 12:57:09 +0000 (09:57 -0300)]
drm/i915/dmc_wl: Check for non-zero refcount in release work
When the DMC wakelock refcount reaches zero, we know that there are no
users and that we can do the actual release operation on the hardware,
which is queued with a delayed work. The idea of the delayed work is to
avoid performing the release if a new lock user appears (i.e. refcount
gets incremented) in a very short period of time.
Based on the above, the release work should bail out if refcount is
non-zero (meaning new lock users appeared in the meantime), but our
current code actually does the opposite: it bails when refcount is zero.
That means that the wakelock is not released when it should be; and
that, when the work is not canceled in time, it ends up being releasing
when it should not.
Gustavo Sousa [Fri, 8 Nov 2024 12:57:08 +0000 (09:57 -0300)]
drm/i915/dmc_wl: Use non-sleeping variant of MMIO wait
Some display MMIO transactions for offsets in the range that requires
the DMC wakelock happen in atomic context (this has been confirmed
during tests on PTL). That means that we need to use a non-sleeping
variant of MMIO waiting function.
Implement __intel_de_wait_for_register_atomic_nowl() and use it when
waiting for acknowledgment of acquire/release.
v2:
- No __intel_de_wait_for_register_atomic_nowl() wrapper to convert
i915 to display. (Jani)
- Add a quick explanation why DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_TIMEOUT_US is defined
in microseconds. (Luca)
Gustavo Sousa [Fri, 8 Nov 2024 12:57:07 +0000 (09:57 -0300)]
drm/xe: Mimic i915 behavior for non-sleeping MMIO wait
In upcoming display changes, we will modify the DMC wakelock MMIO
waiting code to choose a non-sleeping variant implementation, because
the wakelock is also taking in atomic context.
While xe provides an explicit parameter (namely "atomic") to prevent
xe_mmio_wait32() from sleeping, i915 does not and implements that
behavior when slow_timeout_ms is zero.
So, for now, let's mimic what i915 does to allow for display to use
non-sleeping MMIO wait. In the future, we should come up with a better
and explicit interface for this behavior in i915, at least while display
code is not an independent entity with proper interfaces between xe and
i915.
v2:
- Make the tone in comment the comment added in
__intel_wait_for_register() more explanatory than a FIXME-like text.
(Luca)
Suraj Kandpal [Thu, 7 Nov 2024 02:28:08 +0000 (07:58 +0530)]
drm/i915/hdcp: Handle HDCP Line Rekeying for HDCP 1.4
TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL asks us to disable hdcp line rekeying when not in
hdcp 2.2 and we are not using an hdmi transcoder and it need to be
enabled when we are using an HDMI transcoder to enable HDCP 1.4.
We use intel_de_rmw cycles to update TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL register so
we cannot depend on the value being 0 by default everytime which calls
for seprate handling of HDCP 1.4 case.
--v2
-Use the exising function and modify it based on a bool rather than
have a different function [Matt]
--v3
-No need for kzalloc [Jani]
--v4
-i915_reg_t should not be pointer [Jani]
-use rekey_bit to ensure when writing to reg everything is initialized
Ville Syrjälä [Tue, 29 Oct 2024 21:52:17 +0000 (23:52 +0200)]
drm/i915/cdclk: Unify cdclk max() parameter order
In some places we do
min_cdclk = max(min_cdclk, other_min_cdclk)
and in other places we have the arguments swapped as
min_cdclk = max(other_min_cdclk, min_cdclk)
Unify everyone to use the first order of arguments, because
it looks cleaner, especially within intel_crtc_compute_min_cdclk()
which is doing a lot of these back-to-back.
Ville Syrjälä [Tue, 29 Oct 2024 21:52:10 +0000 (23:52 +0200)]
drm/i915/cdclk: Extract intel_audio_min_cdclk()
Pull the audio min cdclk calculation into a helper and hide
it inside intel_audio.c in order to keep most audio related
details in one place.
The one audio related thing that remains in intel_cdclk.c
is commit 451eaa1a614c ("drm/i915: Bump GLK CDCLK frequency when
driving multiple pipes") but given that's implemented in terms
of the cdclk_state I think it should stay put.
Ville Syrjälä [Tue, 29 Oct 2024 21:52:09 +0000 (23:52 +0200)]
drm/i915/cdclk: Extract hsw_ips_min_cdclk()
Pull the whole BDW IPS min CDCLK stuff into the IPS code
so that all the details around IPS are contained in once
place.
Note that while
- min_cdclk = DIV_ROUND_UP(min_cdclk * 100, 95);
vs.
+ min_cdclk = max(DIV_ROUND_UP(crtc_state->pixel_rate * 100, 95), min_cdclk)
may look different, they are in fact the same because
min_cdclk==crtc_state->pixel_rate at this point in
intel_crtc_compute_min_cdclk() on BDW.
Ville Syrjälä [Tue, 29 Oct 2024 21:52:08 +0000 (23:52 +0200)]
drm/i915/cdclk: Extract intel_cdclk_guardband() and intel_cdclk_ppc()
We are duplicating the CDCLK guardband and "pixels per clock"
figures in two places. Pull those out into small helpers that
can be used by both places.
Ville Syrjälä [Wed, 6 Nov 2024 22:09:04 +0000 (00:09 +0200)]
drm/i915/dsi: Stop using pixel_format_from_register_bits() to parse VBT
Introduce a proper VBT->enum mipi_dsi_pixel_format converter
instead of abusing pixel_format_from_register_bits() (whose
job is to parse the pixel format from some pre-ICL DSI
hardware register).
Imre Deak [Wed, 30 Oct 2024 19:23:12 +0000 (21:23 +0200)]
drm/i915/adlp+/dp_mst: Align slave transcoder sequences with spec wrt. DP2 config
On ADLP+ during modeset enabling and disabling, enable and disable the DP2
configuration for MST slave transcoders as required by the specification.
Update the documentation of intel_ddi_config_transcoder_func() /
intel_ddi_disable_transcoder_func() based on the above. While at it also
clarify the programming steps of these functions specific to transcoder
types.
v2:
- Enable/disable the DP2 config from
intel_ddi_config_transcoder_func()/intel_ddi_disable_transcoder_func().
(Jani)
- Handle all ADLP+ platforms in one patch, instead of doing that
separately wrt. PTL.
Imre Deak [Wed, 30 Oct 2024 19:23:10 +0000 (21:23 +0200)]
drm/i915/adlp+/dp_mst: Align slave transcoder enabling with spec wrt. DDI function
On ADLP+ during modeset enabling configure the DDI function without
enabling it for MST slave transcoders before programming the data and
link M/N values. The DDI function gets enabled separately later in the
transcoder enabling sequence.
Align the code with the spec based on the above.
v2: Move this patch earlier in the series, addressing the DP2
config fixes for all ADLP+ platforms later.
Imre Deak [Wed, 30 Oct 2024 19:23:09 +0000 (21:23 +0200)]
drm/i915/ptl/dp_mst: Fix slave transcoder enabling wrt. DDI function
On PTL during modeset enabling configure the DDI function without
enabling it for MST slave transcoders before programming the data and
link M/N values. The DDI function gets enabled separately later in the
transcoder enabling sequence.
This fixes a slave transcoder getting stuck during enabling, leading
to page flip timeout errors on the corresponding pipe.
The spec requires the same programming step for ADLP+ platforms, that
will be addressed separately (on those platforms the above transcoder
getting stuck issue was not observed).
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 31 Oct 2024 15:56:45 +0000 (17:56 +0200)]
drm/i915: Sanitize MBUS joining
If the system boots with MBUS joining enabled but we disable
the relevant pipe during sanitation we later get into trouble
as the rest of the code doesn't expect MBUS joining to be
enabled unless the set of active pipes is in agreement.
We could relax some of the MBUS joining related checks during
normal atomic commits to let this slide, but that might also
let some real bugs through. So let's sanitize the MBUS joining
instead. And in order to keep things more or less in sync we'll
do the related credit, cdclk/mdclk ratio, etc. updates as well.
We'll stick to sturct drm_i915_private for now (instead of
struct intel_display) since the rest of the skl wm code does the
same, and we might need to bakport this.
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 31 Oct 2024 15:56:44 +0000 (17:56 +0200)]
drm/i915: Extract mbus_ctl_join_update()
We'll be wanting to reprogram the MBUS_CTL register during an
upcoming MBUS sanitation stage. Extract the reprogramming
into a helper that doesn't depend on the full atomic state
so that it can be reused.
We'll stick to sturct drm_i915_private for now (instead of
struct intel_display) since the rest of the skl wm code does the
same, and we might need to bakport this.
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 31 Oct 2024 15:56:43 +0000 (17:56 +0200)]
drm/i915: Extract pipe_mbus_dbox_ctl_update()
We'll be wanting to reprogram the PIPE_MBUS_DBOX_CTL registers
during an upcoming MBUS sanitation stage. Extract the reprogramming
loop into a helper that doesn't depend on the full atomic state
so that it can be reused.
We'll stick to sturct drm_i915_private for now (instead of
struct intel_display) since the rest of the skl wm code does the
same, and we might need to bakport this.
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 31 Oct 2024 15:56:42 +0000 (17:56 +0200)]
drm/i915: Extract pipe_mbus_dbox_ctl()
We'll be wanting to reprogram the PIPE_MBUS_DBOX_CTL registers
during an upcoming MBUS sanitation stage. To make that easier
extract a helper that computes the full register value for us.
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 31 Oct 2024 15:56:41 +0000 (17:56 +0200)]
drm/i915: Relocate the SKL wm sanitation code
In order to add more MBUS sanitation into the code we'll want
to reuse a bunch of the code that performs the MBUS/related
hardware programming. Currently that code comes after the
main skl_wm_get_hw_state_and_sanitize() entrypoint. In order
to avoid annoying forward declarations relocate the
skl_wm_get_hw_state_and_sanitize() and related stuff nearer to
the end of the file.
Ankit Nautiyal [Wed, 30 Oct 2024 04:10:36 +0000 (09:40 +0530)]
drm/i915/dp: Enable 3 DSC engines for 12 slices
Certain resolutions require 12 DSC slices support along with ultrajoiner.
For such cases, the third DSC Engine per Pipe is enabled. Each DSC
Engine processes 1 Slice, resulting in a total of 12 VDSC slices
(4 Pipes * 3 DSC Instances per Pipe).
Add support for 12 DSC slices and 3 DSC engines for such modes.
v2: Add missing check for 3 slices support only with 4 joined pipes.
(Suraj)
Ankit Nautiyal [Wed, 30 Oct 2024 04:10:35 +0000 (09:40 +0530)]
drm/i915/dp: Ensure hactive is divisible by slice count
According to the DSC spec, the slice width should be chosen such that
the picture width (hactive) is evenly divisible by the slice width.
If not, extra pixels (padding) must be added to the last slice to
ensure all slices have the same width.
Currently, we do not support handling these extra pixels.
Therefore, select a slice count that evenly divides the hactive
(slice_width = hactive / slice_count).
This check is already implemented for DSI, where the slice count is
selected from the BIOS.
For DP, currently with 1, 2, 4 slices per pipe it is unlikely to have
slice count not being able to divide hactive, but with 3 DSC engines
and 3 slices, we can have such cases. Adding this check prepares for
future scenarios where such configurations might be used.
Ankit Nautiyal [Wed, 30 Oct 2024 04:10:31 +0000 (09:40 +0530)]
drm/i915/display: Prepare for dsc 3 stream splitter
At the moment dsc_split represents whether the dsc splitter is used
or not. With 3 DSC engines, the splitter can split into two streams
or three streams.
Instead of representing the splitter's state, it is more effective to
represent the number of DSC streams per pipe.
Replace the `dsc.dsc_split` member with `dsc.num_streams` to indicate the
number of DSC streams used per pipe. This change will implicitly
convey the splitter's operation mode.
v2: Avoid new enum for dsc split. (Suraj)
v3:
-Replace dsc_split with num_stream. (Suraj)
-Avoid extra parentheses. (Jani)
v4: Set num_streams to 1, if VDSC_JOINER not set while readout.
Ankit Nautiyal [Wed, 30 Oct 2024 04:10:30 +0000 (09:40 +0530)]
drm/i915/dp: Update Comment for Valid DSC Slices per Line
For some platforms, the maximum slices per DSC engine is 4, while for
others it is 2. Update the comment to reflect this and clarify that
the 'valid_dsc_slicecount' list represents the valid number of slices
per pipe.
Currently, we are working with 1, and 2 slices per DSC engine,
which works for all platforms. With this the number of slices per pipe
can be 1,2 or 4 with different slice & DSC engine configuration.
Add a #TODO for adding support for 4 slices per DSC engine where
supported.
drm/i915/gsc: ARL-H and ARL-U need a newer GSC FW.
All MTL and ARL SKUs share the same GSC FW, but the newer platforms are
only supported in newer blobs. In particular, ARL-S is supported
starting from 102.0.10.1878 (which is already the minimum required
version for ARL in the code), while ARL-H and ARL-U are supported from
102.1.15.1926. Therefore, the driver needs to check which specific ARL
subplatform its running on when verifying that the GSC FW is new enough
for it.
Fixes: 2955ae8186c8 ("drm/i915: ARL requires a newer GSC firmware") Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241028233132.149745-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Jani Nikula [Tue, 29 Oct 2024 09:25:25 +0000 (11:25 +0200)]
drm/i915: add a dedicated mutex for VLV/CHV IOSF sideband
The VLV/CHV IOSF sideband is unrelated to pcode. It's just confusing to
piggyback on the same mutex. Add a dedicated lock with init and cleanup
functions.
Jani Nikula [Tue, 29 Oct 2024 09:25:24 +0000 (11:25 +0200)]
drm/i915/sbi: add a dedicated mutex for LPT/WPT IOSF sideband
The LPT/WPT IOSF sideband is unrelated to pcode or VLV/CHV IOSF
sideband. It's just confusing to piggyback on the same mutex. Add a
dedicated lock with init and cleanup functions.
Suraj Kandpal [Mon, 4 Nov 2024 18:50:55 +0000 (00:20 +0530)]
drm/i915/xe3lpd: Update HDCP rekeying bit
The TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL bit used to enable/disable HDCP rekeying
has moved from bit 12 (Xe2) to bit 15 (Xe3); update the RMW
toggle accordingly.
Also drop the misleading workaround comment tag on this function
since disabling of HDCP rekeying is something that happens on
all platforms, not just those impacted by that workaround.
While we're here, also re-order the if/else ladder to use
standard "newest platform first" order.
v2: add additional definition instead of function, commit message typo
fix and update.
v3: restore lost conditional from v2.
v4: subject line and subject message updated, fix the if ladder order,
fix the bit definition order.
v5: Add the bspec link and remove the Wa comment tag
v6: Rebase over new changes
v7: Fix commit subject and message, reladder the if/else blocks
drm/i915/display: Allow fastset for change in HDR infoframe
Changes in Dynamic Range and Mastering infoframe
should not trigger a full modeset. Therefore, allow
fastset. DP SDP programming is already hooked up in the
fastset flow but HDMI AVI infoframe update is not, add it.
Any other infoframe that can be fastset should be added to
the helper intel_hdmi_fastset_infoframes().
v3:
- Create a wrapper intel_ddi_update_pipe_hdmi to stick to
uniform naming (Jani)
- Do not disable HDMI AVI infoframe if already disabled (Uma)
Jouni Högander [Tue, 29 Oct 2024 12:24:15 +0000 (14:24 +0200)]
drm/i915/psr: WA for panels stating bad link status after PSR is enabled
We are currently seeing unexpected link trainings with several different
eDP panels. These are caused by these panels stating bad link status in
their dpcd registers. This can be observed by doing following test:
1. Boot up without Xe module loaded
2. Load Xe module with PSR disabled:
$ modprobe xe enable_psr=0
3. Read panel link status register
$ dpcd_reg read --offset 0x200e --count=1
0x200e: 00
4. Enable PSR, sleep for 2 seconds and disable PSR again:
Currently, even though there is a bit to control FEC enable/disable
individually, the FEC Decode Enable sequence is sent by the SOC only
once TRANS_CONF enable is set. This ties the FEC enabling too tightly
to modeset and therefore cannot be re-issued (in case of failure)
without a modeset.
From PTL, FEC_DECODE_EN sequence can be sent to a DPRX independent
of TRANS_CONF enable. This allows us to re-issue an FEC_DECODE_EN
sequence without a modeset. Hence allowing us to have a retry
mechanism in case the DPRX does not respond with an FEC_ENABLE
within certain amount of time.
While at it, replace struct drm_i915_private with struct intel_display
v4:
- More code refactor [Jani]
- use struct intel_display [Jani]
- Optimize logging [Jani]
v3:
- Make the commit message more legible [Jani]
- Refactor code to re-use existing code [Jani]
- Do away with platform dependent FEC enable checks [Jani]
v2:
- Refactor code to avoid duplication and improve readability [Jani]
- In case of PTL, wait for FEC status directly after FEC enable [Srikanth]
- Wait for FEC_ENABLE_LIVE_STATUS to be cleared before
re-enabling FEC [Srikanth]
drm/i915: Implement Dbuf overlap detection feature starting from LNL
From LNL onwards there is a new hardware feature, which
allows to detect if the driver wrongly allocated DBuf
entries and they happen to overlap. If enabled this will
cause a specific interrupt to occur.
We now handle it in the driver, by writing correspondent
error message to kernel log.
v2: Initialize dbuf overlap flag in runtime_defaults (Jani Nikula)
Imre Deak [Fri, 25 Oct 2024 16:02:59 +0000 (19:02 +0300)]
drm/i915/dp: Write the source OUI for non-eDP sinks as well
At least the i-tec USB-C Nano 2x Display Docking Station (containing a
Synaptics MST branch device) requires the driver to update the source
OUI DPCD registers to expose its DSC capability. Accordingly update the
OUI for all sink types (besides eDP where this has been done already).
Imre Deak [Fri, 25 Oct 2024 16:02:58 +0000 (19:02 +0300)]
drm/i915/dp: Write the source OUI during connector detection
The DP sink's capabilities, like DSC, may depend on the source OUI
written to the sink. On eDP this OUI value could have been reset before
the detection started if the panel power on it got disabled. Make sure
the OUI is re-written at the beginning of detection in this case, before
the sink capabilities are read out.
Imre Deak [Fri, 25 Oct 2024 16:02:57 +0000 (19:02 +0300)]
drm/i915/dp: Write the source OUI for eDP before detecting sink capabilities
The eDP sink's capabilities, like DSC, may depend on the source OUI
written to the sink, so ensure the OUI is written before reading out the
capabilities.
Imre Deak [Fri, 25 Oct 2024 16:02:55 +0000 (19:02 +0300)]
drm/i915/dp: Track source OUI validity explicitly
While updating the source OUI on the sink the driver should avoid
writing the OUI if it's already up-to-date to prevent the sink from
resetting itself in response to the update. On eDP - the only output
type where the OUI was updated so far - the driver ensured this by
comparing the current source OUI DPCD register values with the expected
Intel OUI value, skipping the update in case of a match. On some non-eDP
sinks - at least on Synaptics branch devices - this method doesn't work,
since the source OUI DPCD registers read back as all 0, even after
updating the registers.
Handle the above kind of sinks by tracking when the OUI was updated and
so should be valid, regardless of what the DPCD registers contain.
eDP sinks reset the written source OUI value when the panel power is
disabled, invalidate the OUI state accordingly.
This is required by a follow-up patch updating the source OUI for
non-eDP sink types as well.
v2: Fix setting intel_dp::oui_valid=true, if the DPCD register contains
already the expected value.
Imre Deak [Fri, 25 Oct 2024 16:02:54 +0000 (19:02 +0300)]
drm/i915/dp: Initialize the source OUI write timestamp always
If the source OUI DPCD register value matches the expected Intel OUI
value, the write timestamp doesn't get updated leaving it at the 0
initial value if the OUI wasn't written before. This can lead to an
incorrect wait duration in intel_dp_wait_source_oui(), since jiffies is
not inited to 0 in general (on a 32 bit system INITIAL_JIFFIES is set to
5 minutes ahead of wrap-around). Fix this by intializing the write
timestamp in the above case as well.
Imre Deak [Fri, 25 Oct 2024 16:02:53 +0000 (19:02 +0300)]
drm/i915/dp: Ensure panel power remains enabled during connector detection
The sink's capabilities, like the DSC caps, depend on the source OUI
written to the sink's DPCD registers and so this OUI value should be
valid for the whole duration of the detection. An eDP sink will reset
this OUI value when the panel power is disabled, so prevent the
disabling - happening by default after a 1 sec idle period - for the
whole duration of detection.
v2: Update the documentation for intel_pps_on(). (Jani)
Imre Deak [Fri, 25 Oct 2024 16:02:52 +0000 (19:02 +0300)]
drm/i915/dp: Flush modeset commits during connector detection
Make sure that a DP connector detection doesn't happen in parallel
with an ongoing modeset on the connector. The reasons for this are:
- Besides reading the capabilities, EDID etc. the detection may change
the state of the sink (via the AUX bus), for instance by setting the
LTTPR mode or the source OUI (the latter introduced by an upcoming
patch). It's better to avoid such changes affecting an onging modeset
in any way.
- During a modeset's link training any access to DPCD registers, besides
the registers used for link training should be avoided, at least in
the LTTPR non-transparent and transparent link training modes.
Such asynchronous accesses - besides connector detection - can also
happen via the AUX device node for instance, for those a parallel
modeset will have to be avoided in a similar way to the change in this
patch. (A topic for a follow-up change.)
- The source OUI written to an eDP sink is valid only while the panel
power is enabled. A modeset on eDP will enable/disable the panel power
synchronously; this should be prevented in the middle of the connector
detection, to ensure a consistent sink state (which depends on the
source OUI) for the whole duration of detection. The panel power could
still get disabled during detection after an idle period (1 sec), this
will be prevented by the next patch.
v2: (Ville)
- s/wait_for_crtc_hw_done/wait_for_connector_hw_done
- Get drm_device using an intel_display instead of drm_i915_private ptr.
Jani Nikula [Mon, 28 Oct 2024 20:07:27 +0000 (22:07 +0200)]
drm/i915/power: convert assert_chv_phy_status() to struct intel_display
struct intel_display will replace struct drm_i915_private as the main
device pointer for display code. Switch assert_chv_phy_status() and its
callers to it. Main motivation to do just one function is to stop
passing i915 to intel_de_wait(), so its generic wrapper can be removed.
Jani Nikula [Mon, 28 Oct 2024 20:07:26 +0000 (22:07 +0200)]
drm/i915/display: convert vlv_wait_port_ready() to struct intel_display
struct intel_display will replace struct drm_i915_private as the main
device pointer for display code. Switch vlv_wait_port_ready() over to
it. The main motivation to do just one function is to stop passing i915
to intel_de_wait(), so its generic wrapper can be removed.
Jani Nikula [Mon, 28 Oct 2024 19:48:43 +0000 (21:48 +0200)]
drm/i915/display: add subplatform group for HSW/BDW ULT
Add support for defining aliases for subplatform groups, such as HSW/BDW
ULT that covers both ULT and ULX.
ULT is a special case, because we slightly abuse the ULT subplatform
both as a subplatform and group, but with the way this is defined, it
should be fairly clear.
This follows i915 core and IS_HASWELL_ULT()/IS_BROADWELL_ULT()
conventions, i.e. "is ULT" also matches ULX platforms.
Note: Pedantically, this should have been done earlier, but it's only
feasible now that we no longer have a subplatform enum and can actually
initialize multiple subplatforms.
Jani Nikula [Mon, 28 Oct 2024 19:48:41 +0000 (21:48 +0200)]
drm/i915/display: remove the display platform enum as unnecessary
The display platform enums are not really needed for anything. Remove.
Without the enum, PLATFORM_UNINITIALIZED is also no longer needed for
keeping the first enum 0. Also need to switch from sp->subplatform to
sp->pciidlist as the check for array end.
Jani Nikula [Mon, 28 Oct 2024 19:48:39 +0000 (21:48 +0200)]
drm/i915/display: add display platforms structure with platform members
Add a structure with a bitfield member for each platform and
subplatform, and initialize them in platform and subplatform descs.
The structure also contains a bitmap in a union for easier manipulation
of the bits. This, in turn, requires a bit of trickery with
INTEL_DISPLAY_PLATFORMS() to count the number of bits required for
DECLARE_BITMAP().
Jani Nikula [Mon, 28 Oct 2024 19:48:35 +0000 (21:48 +0200)]
drm/i915/display: use a macro to initialize subplatforms
Make it easier to change the underlying structures by using a macro
similar to PLATFORM() for initialization.
The subplatform names in debug logs change slightly as they now reflect
the enum rather than manually entered names. For example, RAPTORLAKE_S
rather than RPL-S.
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 24 Oct 2024 16:53:55 +0000 (19:53 +0300)]
drm/i915/color: Convert color management code to intel_display
struct intel_display will replace struct drm_i915_private as
the main thing for display code. Convert the color management
code to use it (as much as possible at this stage).
Ville Syrjälä [Thu, 24 Oct 2024 16:53:53 +0000 (19:53 +0300)]
drm/i915/color: Pimp debugs
Include the CRTC id+name information in the color management
debug prints to help identify who is at fault. And also specify
which LUT check_lut_size() is unhappy about.
Haridhar Kalvala [Mon, 28 Oct 2024 19:30:15 +0000 (12:30 -0700)]
drm/xe/ptl: Enable PTL display
At this point we should have enough support landed to turn on and start
basic testing of display functionality.
Signed-off-by: Haridhar Kalvala <haridhar.kalvala@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Clint Taylor <Clinton.A.Taylor@intel.com> Acked-by: Jani Saarinen <jani.saarinen@intel.com> Tested-by: Jani Saarinen<jani.saarinen@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241028193015.3241858-10-clinton.a.taylor@intel.com