Commit 9e5da3d055 (add: use separate ADD_CACHE_RENORMALIZE flag,
2019-01-17) switched out using HASH_RENORMALIZE in our flags field for a
new ADD_CACHE_RENORMALIZE flag. However, it forgot to convert one of the
checks for HASH_RENORMALIZE into the new flag, which totally broke "git
add --renormalize".
To make matters even more confusing, the resulting code would racily
pass the tests! The forgotten check was responsible for defeating the
up-to-date check of the index entry. That meant that "git add
--renormalize" would refuse to renormalize things that appeared
stat-clean. But most of the time the test commands run fast enough that
the file mtime is the same as the index mtime. And thus we err on the
conservative side and re-hash the file, which is what "--renormalize"
would have wanted.
But if you're unlucky and cross that one-second boundary between writing
the file and writing the index (which is more likely to happen on a slow
or heavily-loaded system), then the file appears stat-clean. And
"--renormalize" would effectively do nothing.
The fix is straightforward: convert this check to use the right flag.
Noticed-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Jeff King [Thu, 17 Jan 2019 16:27:11 +0000 (11:27 -0500)]
add: use separate ADD_CACHE_RENORMALIZE flag
Commit 9472935d81 (add: introduce "--renormalize", 2017-11-16) taught
git-add to pass HASH_RENORMALIZE to add_to_index(), which then passes
the flag along to index_path(). However, the flags taken by
add_to_index() and the ones taken by index_path() are distinct
namespaces. We cannot take HASH_* flags in add_to_index(), because they
overlap with the ADD_CACHE_* flags we already take (in this case,
HASH_RENORMALIZE conflicts with ADD_CACHE_IGNORE_ERRORS).
We can solve this by adding a new ADD_CACHE_RENORMALIZE flag, and using
it to set HASH_RENORMALIZE within add_to_index(). In order to make it
clear that these two flags come from distinct sets, let's also change
the name "newflags" in the function to "hash_flags".
Reported-by: Dmitriy Smirnov <dmitriy.smirnov@jetbrains.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Junio C Hamano [Wed, 21 Nov 2018 13:58:00 +0000 (22:58 +0900)]
Merge branch 'ma/commit-graph-docs' into maint
Doc update.
* ma/commit-graph-docs:
Doc: refer to the "commit-graph file" with dash
git-commit-graph.txt: refer to "*commit*-graph file"
git-commit-graph.txt: typeset more in monospace
git-commit-graph.txt: fix bullet lists
Junio C Hamano [Wed, 21 Nov 2018 13:57:58 +0000 (22:57 +0900)]
Merge branch 'fe/doc-updates' into maint
Doc updates.
* fe/doc-updates:
git-describe.1: clarify that "human readable" is also git-readable
git-column.1: clarify initial description, provide examples
git-archimport.1: specify what kind of Arch we're talking about
Junio C Hamano [Wed, 21 Nov 2018 13:57:52 +0000 (22:57 +0900)]
Merge branch 'md/exclude-promisor-objects-fix' into maint
Operations on promisor objects make sense in the context of only a
small subset of the commands that internally use the revisions
machinery, but the "--exclude-promisor-objects" option were taken
and led to nonsense results by commands like "log", to which it
didn't make much sense. This has been corrected.
* md/exclude-promisor-objects-fix:
exclude-promisor-objects: declare when option is allowed
Documentation/git-log.txt: do not show --exclude-promisor-objects
Junio C Hamano [Wed, 21 Nov 2018 13:57:51 +0000 (22:57 +0900)]
Merge branch 'js/shallow-and-fetch-prune' into maint
"git repack" in a shallow clone did not correctly update the
shallow points in the repository, leading to a repository that
does not pass fsck.
* js/shallow-and-fetch-prune:
repack -ad: prune the list of shallow commits
shallow: offer to prune only non-existing entries
repack: point out a bug handling stale shallow info
Junio C Hamano [Wed, 21 Nov 2018 13:57:51 +0000 (22:57 +0900)]
Merge branch 'jc/receive-deny-current-branch-fix' into maint
The receive.denyCurrentBranch=updateInstead codepath kicked in even
when the push should have been rejected due to other reasons, such
as it does not fast-forward or the update-hook rejects it, which
has been corrected.
* jc/receive-deny-current-branch-fix:
receive: denyCurrentBranch=updateinstead should not blindly update
Junio C Hamano [Wed, 21 Nov 2018 13:57:50 +0000 (22:57 +0900)]
Merge branch 'js/diff-notice-has-drive-prefix' into maint
Under certain circumstances, "git diff D:/a/b/c D:/a/b/d" on
Windows would strip initial parts from the paths because they
were not recognized as absolute, which has been corrected.
* js/diff-notice-has-drive-prefix:
diff: don't attempt to strip prefix from absolute Windows paths
Junio C Hamano [Wed, 21 Nov 2018 13:57:49 +0000 (22:57 +0900)]
Merge branch 'np/log-graph-octopus-fix' into maint
"git log --graph" showing an octopus merge sometimes miscounted the
number of display columns it is consuming to show the merge and its
parent commits, which has been corrected.
* np/log-graph-octopus-fix:
log: fix coloring of certain octopus merge shapes
Junio C Hamano [Wed, 21 Nov 2018 13:57:48 +0000 (22:57 +0900)]
Merge branch 'sg/split-index-racefix' into maint
The codepath to support the experimental split-index mode had
remaining "racily clean" issues fixed.
* sg/split-index-racefix:
split-index: BUG() when cache entry refers to non-existing shared entry
split-index: smudge and add racily clean cache entries to split index
split-index: don't compare cached data of entries already marked for split index
split-index: count the number of deleted entries
t1700-split-index: date back files to avoid racy situations
split-index: add tests to demonstrate the racy split index problem
t1700-split-index: document why FSMONITOR is disabled in this test script
Junio C Hamano [Wed, 21 Nov 2018 13:57:48 +0000 (22:57 +0900)]
Merge branch 'jt/non-blob-lazy-fetch' into maint
A partial clone that is configured to lazily fetch missing objects
will on-demand issue a "git fetch" request to the originating
repository to fill not-yet-obtained objects. The request has been
optimized for requesting a tree object (and not the leaf blob
objects contained in it) by telling the originating repository that
no blobs are needed.
* jt/non-blob-lazy-fetch:
fetch-pack: exclude blobs when lazy-fetching trees
fetch-pack: avoid object flags if no_dependents
Junio C Hamano [Wed, 21 Nov 2018 13:57:48 +0000 (22:57 +0900)]
Merge branch 'en/status-multiple-renames-to-the-same-target-fix' into maint
The code in "git status" sometimes hit an assertion failure. This
was caused by a structure that was reused without cleaning the data
used for the first run, which has been corrected.
* en/status-multiple-renames-to-the-same-target-fix:
commit: fix erroneous BUG, 'multiple renames on the same target? how?'
Junio C Hamano [Wed, 21 Nov 2018 13:57:47 +0000 (22:57 +0900)]
Merge branch 'ds/commit-graph-with-grafts' into maint
The recently introduced commit-graph auxiliary data is incompatible
with mechanisms such as replace & grafts that "breaks" immutable
nature of the object reference relationship. Disable optimizations
based on its use (and updating existing commit-graph) when these
incompatible features are in use in the repository.
* ds/commit-graph-with-grafts:
commit-graph: close_commit_graph before shallow walk
commit-graph: not compatible with uninitialized repo
commit-graph: not compatible with grafts
commit-graph: not compatible with replace objects
test-repository: properly init repo
commit-graph: update design document
refs.c: upgrade for_each_replace_ref to be a each_repo_ref_fn callback
refs.c: migrate internal ref iteration to pass thru repository argument
Junio C Hamano [Wed, 21 Nov 2018 13:57:45 +0000 (22:57 +0900)]
Merge branch 'nd/attr-pathspec-fix' into maint
"git add ':(attr:foo)'" is not supported and is supposed to be
rejected while the command line arguments are parsed, but we fail
to reject such a command line upfront.
* nd/attr-pathspec-fix:
add: do not accept pathspec magic 'attr'
Junio C Hamano [Wed, 21 Nov 2018 13:57:43 +0000 (22:57 +0900)]
Merge branch 'bp/mv-submodules-with-fsmonitor' into maint
When fsmonitor is in use, after operation on submodules updates
.gitmodules, we lost track of the fact that we did so and relied on
stale fsmonitor data.
* bp/mv-submodules-with-fsmonitor:
git-mv: allow submodules and fsmonitor to work together
Junio C Hamano [Wed, 21 Nov 2018 13:57:42 +0000 (22:57 +0900)]
Merge branch 'js/rebase-i-autosquash-fix' into maint
"git rebase -i" did not clear the state files correctly when a run
of "squash/fixup" is aborted and then the user manually amended the
commit instead, which has been corrected.
* js/rebase-i-autosquash-fix:
rebase -i: be careful to wrap up fixup/squash chains
rebase -i --autosquash: demonstrate a problem skipping the last squash
Junio C Hamano [Wed, 21 Nov 2018 13:57:41 +0000 (22:57 +0900)]
Merge branch 'jk/trailer-fixes' into maint
"git interpret-trailers" and its underlying machinery had a buggy
code that attempted to ignore patch text after commit log message,
which triggered in various codepaths that will always get the log
message alone and never get such an input.
* jk/trailer-fixes:
append_signoff: use size_t for string offsets
sequencer: ignore "---" divider when parsing trailers
pretty, ref-filter: format %(trailers) with no_divider option
interpret-trailers: allow suppressing "---" divider
interpret-trailers: tighten check for "---" patch boundary
trailer: pass process_trailer_opts to trailer_info_get()
trailer: use size_t for iterating trailer list
trailer: use size_t for string offsets
Jeff King [Tue, 30 Oct 2018 23:23:38 +0000 (19:23 -0400)]
cat-file: handle streaming failures consistently
There are three ways to convince cat-file to stream a blob:
- cat-file -p $blob
- cat-file blob $blob
- echo $batch | cat-file --batch
In the first two, we simply exit with the error code of
streaw_blob_to_fd(). That means that an error will cause us
to exit with "-1" (which we try to avoid) without printing
any kind of error message (which is confusing to the user).
Instead, let's match the third case, which calls die() on an
error. Unfortunately we cannot be more specific, as
stream_blob_to_fd() does not tell us whether the problem was
on reading (e.g., a corrupt object) or on writing (e.g.,
ENOSPC). That might be an opportunity for future work, but
for now we will at least exit with a sane message and exit
code.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Jeff King [Tue, 30 Oct 2018 23:23:12 +0000 (19:23 -0400)]
check_stream_sha1(): handle input underflow
This commit fixes an infinite loop when fscking large
truncated loose objects.
The check_stream_sha1() function takes an mmap'd loose
object buffer and streams 4k of output at a time, checking
its sha1. The loop quits when we've output enough bytes (we
know the size from the object header), or when zlib tells us
anything except Z_OK or Z_BUF_ERROR.
The latter is expected because zlib may run out of room in
our 4k buffer, and that is how it tells us to process the
output and loop again.
But Z_BUF_ERROR also covers another case: one in which zlib
cannot make forward progress because it needs more _input_.
This should never happen in this loop, because though we're
streaming the output, we have the entire deflated input
available in the mmap'd buffer. But since we don't check
this case, we'll just loop infinitely if we do see a
truncated object, thinking that zlib is asking for more
output space.
It's tempting to fix this by checking stream->avail_in as
part of the loop condition (and quitting if all of our bytes
have been consumed). But that assumes that once zlib has
consumed the input, there is nothing left to do. That's not
necessarily the case: it may have read our input into its
internal state, but still have bytes to output.
Instead, let's continue on Z_BUF_ERROR only when we see the
case we're expecting: the previous round filled our output
buffer completely. If it didn't (and we still saw
Z_BUF_ERROR), we know something is wrong and should break
out of the loop.
The bug comes from commit f6371f9210 (sha1_file: add
read_loose_object() function, 2017-01-13), which
reimplemented some of the existing loose object functions.
So it's worth checking if this bug was inherited from any of
those. The answers seems to be no. The two obvious
candidates are both OK:
1. unpack_sha1_rest(); this doesn't need to loop on
Z_BUF_ERROR at all, since it allocates the expected
output buffer in advance (which we can't do since we're
explicitly streaming here)
2. check_object_signature(); the streaming path relies on
the istream interface, which uses read_istream_loose()
for this case. That function uses a similar "is our
output buffer full" check with Z_BUF_ERROR (which is
where I stole it from for this patch!)
Reported-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Jeff King [Tue, 30 Oct 2018 23:18:51 +0000 (19:18 -0400)]
t1450: check large blob in trailing-garbage test
Commit cce044df7f (fsck: detect trailing garbage in all
object types, 2017-01-13) added two tests of trailing
garbage in a loose object file: one with a commit and one
with a blob. The point of having two is that blobs would
follow a different code path that streamed the contents,
instead of loading it into a buffer as usual.
At the time, merely being a blob was enough to trigger the
streaming code path. But since 7ac4f3a007 (fsck: actually
fsck blob data, 2018-05-02), we now only stream blobs that
are actually large. So since then, the streaming code path
is not tested at all for this case.
We can restore the original intent of the test by tweaking
core.bigFileThreshold to make our small blob seem large.
There's no easy way to externally verify that we followed
the streaming code path, but I did check before/after using
a temporary debug statement.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Johannes Sixt [Sat, 27 Oct 2018 08:08:01 +0000 (10:08 +0200)]
t3404-rebase-interactive: test abbreviated commands
Make sure that each short command is tested at least once. To
not exacerbate the runtime of the test script, do not add new
tests, but modify existing ones according to these criteria:
- The test does not have a prerequisite.
- The 'git rebase' command is not guarded by test_must_fail.
The pick commands are optional in the FAKE_LINES variable, but
when used, they do end up in the insn sheet. Test them, too.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If a "char" in C is signed or unsigned is not specified, because it is
out of tradition "implementation dependent".
Therefore constructs like "if (name[i] < 0)" are not portable,
use "if (name[i] & 0x80)" instead.
Detected by "gcc (Raspbian 6.3.0-18+rpi1+deb9u1) 6.3.0 20170516" when
setting
DEVELOPER = 1
DEVOPTS = extra-all
Signed-off-by: Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Jeff King [Wed, 24 Oct 2018 07:27:52 +0000 (03:27 -0400)]
upload-pack: fix broken if/else chain in config callback
The upload_pack_config() callback uses an if/else chain
like:
if (!strcmp(var, "a"))
...
else if (!strcmp(var, "b"))
...
etc
This works as long as the conditions are mutually exclusive,
but one of them is not. 20b20a22f8 (upload-pack: provide a
hook for running pack-objects, 2016-05-18) added:
else if (current_config_scope() != CONFIG_SCOPE_REPO) {
... check some more options ...
}
That was fine in that commit, because it came at the end of
the chain. But later, 10ac85c785 (upload-pack: add object
filtering for partial clone, 2017-12-08) did this:
else if (current_config_scope() != CONFIG_SCOPE_REPO) {
... check some more options ...
} else if (!strcmp("uploadpack.allowfilter", var))
...
We'd always check the scope condition first, meaning we'd
_only_ respect allowfilter when it's in the repo config. You
can see this with:
git -c uploadpack.allowfilter=true upload-pack . | head -1
which will not advertise the filter capability (but will
after this patch). We never noticed because:
- our tests always set it in the repo config
- in protocol v2, we use a different code path that
actually calls repo_config_get_bool() separately, so
that _does_ work. Real-world people experimenting with
this may be using v2.
The more recent uploadpack.allowrefinwant option is in the
same boat.
There are a few possible fixes:
1. Bump the scope conditional back to the bottom of the
chain. But that just means somebody else is likely to
make the same mistake later.
2. Make the conditional more like the others. I.e.:
else if (!current_config_scope() != CONFIG_SCOPE_REPO &&
!strcmp(var, "uploadpack.notallowedinrepo"))
This works, but the idea of the original structure was
that we may grow multiple sensitive options like this.
3. Pull it out of the chain entirely. The chain mostly
serves to avoid extra strcmp() calls after we've found
a match. But it's not worth caring about those. In the
worst case, when there isn't a match, we're already
hitting every strcmp (and this happens regularly for
stuff like "core.bare", etc).
This patch does (3).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Reviewed-by: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Without passing --allow-unrelated-histories the command sequence
fails as intended since commit e379fdf34fee ("merge: refuse to create
too cool a merge by default"). To setup a subtree merging unrelated
histories is normal, so add the option to the howto document.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@kleine-koenig.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
`git repack` can drop unreachable commits without further warning,
making the corresponding entries in `.git/shallow` invalid, which causes
serious problems when deepening the branches.
One scenario where unreachable commits are dropped by `git repack` is
when a `git fetch --prune` (or even a `git fetch` when a ref was
force-pushed in the meantime) can make a commit unreachable that was
reachable before.
Therefore it is not safe to assume that a `git repack -adlf` will keep
unreachable commits alone (under the assumption that they had not been
packed in the first place, which is an assumption at least some of Git's
code seems to make).
This is particularly important to keep in mind when looking at the
`.git/shallow` file: if any commits listed in that file become
unreachable, it is not a problem, but if they go missing, it *is* a
problem. One symptom of this problem is that a deepening fetch may now
fail with
fatal: error in object: unshallow <commit-hash>
To avoid this problem, let's prune the shallow list in `git repack` when
the `-d` option is passed, unless `-A` is passed, too (which would force
the now-unreachable objects to be turned into loose objects instead of
being deleted). Additionally, we also need to take `--keep-reachable`
and `--unpack-unreachable=<date>` into account.
Note: an alternative solution discussed during the review of this patch
was to teach `git fetch` to simply ignore entries in .git/shallow if the
corresponding commits do not exist locally. A quick test, however,
revealed that the .git/shallow file is written during a shallow *clone*,
in which case the commits do not exist, either, but the "shallow" line
*does* need to be sent. Therefore, this approach would be a lot more
finicky than the approach presented by the this patch.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The `prune_shallow()` function wants a full reachability check to be
completed before it goes to work, to ensure that all unreachable entries
are removed from the shallow file.
However, in the upcoming patch we do not even want to go that far. We
really only need to remove entries corresponding to pruned commits, i.e.
to commits that no longer exist.
Let's support that use case.
Rather than extending the signature of `prune_shallow()` to accept
another Boolean, let's turn it into a bit field and declare constants,
for readability.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
repack: point out a bug handling stale shallow info
A `git fetch --prune` can turn previously-reachable objects unreachable,
even commits that are in the `shallow` list. A subsequent `git repack
-ad` will then unceremoniously drop those unreachable commits, and the
`shallow` list will become stale. This means that when we try to fetch
with a larger `--depth` the next time, we may end up with:
fatal: error in object: unshallow <commit-hash>
Reported by Alejandro Pauly.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Jeff King [Wed, 24 Oct 2018 07:38:00 +0000 (03:38 -0400)]
run-command: mark path lookup errors with ENOENT
Since commit e3a434468f (run-command: use the
async-signal-safe execv instead of execvp, 2017-04-19),
prepare_cmd() does its own PATH lookup for any commands we
run (on non-Windows platforms).
However, its logic does not match the old execvp call when
we fail to find a matching entry in the PATH. Instead of
feeding the name directly to execv, execvp would consider
that an ENOENT error. By continuing and passing the name
directly to execv, we effectively behave as if "." was
included at the end of the PATH. This can have confusing and
even dangerous results.
The fix itself is pretty straight-forward. There's a new
test in t0061 to cover this explicitly, and I've also added
a duplicate of the ENOENT test to ensure that we return the
correct errno for this case.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Junio C Hamano [Wed, 24 Oct 2018 01:10:10 +0000 (10:10 +0900)]
cocci: simplify "if (++u > 1)" to "if (u++)"
It is more common to use post-increment than pre-increment when the
side effect is the primary thing we want in our code and in C in
general (unlike C++).
Initializing a variable to 0, incrementing it every time we do
something, and checking if we have already done that thing to guard
the code to do that thing, is easier to understand when written
if (u++)
; /* we've done that! */
else
do_it(); /* just once. */
but if you try to use pre-increment, you end up with a less natural
looking
Matthew DeVore [Tue, 23 Oct 2018 01:13:42 +0000 (18:13 -0700)]
exclude-promisor-objects: declare when option is allowed
The --exclude-promisor-objects option causes some funny behavior in at
least two commands: log and blame. It causes a BUG crash:
$ git log --exclude-promisor-objects
BUG: revision.c:2143: exclude_promisor_objects can only be used
when fetch_if_missing is 0
Aborted
[134]
Fix this such that the option is treated like any other unknown option.
The commands that must support it are limited, so declare in those
commands that the flag is supported. In particular:
pack-objects
prune
rev-list
The commands were found by searching for logic which parses
--exclude-promisor-objects outside of revision.c. Extra logic outside of
revision.c is needed because fetch_if_missing must be turned on before
revision.c sees the option or it will BUG-crash. The above list is
supported by the fact that no other command is introspectively invoked
by another command passing --exclude-promisor-object.
Signed-off-by: Matthew DeVore <matvore@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Matthew DeVore [Tue, 23 Oct 2018 01:13:41 +0000 (18:13 -0700)]
Documentation/git-log.txt: do not show --exclude-promisor-objects
Do not suggest that --exclude-promisor-objects is supported by git-log,
since it currently BUG-crashes and it's not necessary to support it.
Options that control behavior for promisor objects should be limited to
a small number of commands.
Signed-off-by: Matthew DeVore <matvore@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Andreas Heiduk [Mon, 22 Oct 2018 20:45:45 +0000 (22:45 +0200)]
doc: fix indentation of listing blocks in gitweb.conf.txt
'gitweb.conf.txt' uses inconsistent indentation in listing blocks and a mix
of listing blocks and literal paragraphs. Both didn't look pretty in the
rendered HTML page.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Heiduk <asheiduk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Andreas Heiduk [Mon, 22 Oct 2018 20:45:44 +0000 (22:45 +0200)]
doc: fix descripion for 'git tag --format'
The '--format=<format>' is now listed in the 'OPTIONS' section, not only
the '<format>' string itself. The description moved up a few paragraphs
because '<format>' is not a standalone paramater but a parameter for the
option '--format'.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Heiduk <asheiduk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Johannes Sixt [Fri, 19 Oct 2018 16:58:07 +0000 (18:58 +0200)]
diff: don't attempt to strip prefix from absolute Windows paths
git diff can be invoked with absolute paths. Typically, this triggers
the --no-index case. Then the absolute paths remain in the file names
that are printed in the output.
There is one peculiarity, though: When the command is invoked from a
a sub-directory in a repository, then it is attempted to strip the
sub-directory from the beginning of relative paths. Yet, to detect a
relative path the code just checks for an initial forward slash.
This mistakes a Windows style path like "D:/base" as a relative path
and the output looks like this, for example:
If the sub-directory where 'git diff' is invoked is sufficiently deep
that the prefix becomes longer than the path to be printed, then the
subsequent code accesses the path out of bounds.
Use is_absolute_path() to detect Windows style absolute paths.
One might wonder whether the check for a directory separator that
is visible in the patch context should be changed from == '/' to
is_dir_sep() or not. It turns out not to be necessary. That code
only ever investigates paths that have undergone pathspec
normalization, after which there are only forward slashes even on
Windows.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Junio C Hamano [Fri, 19 Oct 2018 04:57:35 +0000 (13:57 +0900)]
receive: denyCurrentBranch=updateinstead should not blindly update
The handling of receive.denyCurrentBranch=updateInstead was added to
a switch statement that handles other values of the variable, but
all the other case arms only checked a condition to reject the
attempted push, or let later logic in the same function to still
intervene, so that a push that does not fast-forward (which is
checked after the switch statement in question) is still rejected.
But the handling of updateInstead incorrectly took immediate effect,
without giving other checks a chance to intervene.
Instead of calling update_worktree() that causes the side effect
immediately, just note the fact that we will need to call the
function later, and first give other checks a chance to reject the
request. After the update-hook gets a chance to reject the push
(which happens as the last step in a series of checks), call
update_worktree() when we earlier detected the need to.
Reported-by: Rajesh Madamanchi Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
pack-objects (mingw): initialize `packing_data` mutex in the correct spot
In 9ac3f0e5b3e4 (pack-objects: fix performance issues on packing large
deltas, 2018-07-22), a mutex was introduced that is used to guard the
call to set the delta size. This commit even added code to initialize
it, but at an incorrect spot: in `init_threaded_search()`, while the
call to `oe_set_delta_size()` (and hence to `packing_data_lock()`) can
happen in the call chain `check_object()` <- `get_object_details()` <-
`prepare_pack()` <- `cmd_pack_objects()`, which is long before the
`prepare_pack()` function calls `ll_find_deltas()` (which initializes
the threaded search).
Another tell-tale that the mutex was initialized in an incorrect spot is
that the function to initialize it lives in builtin/, while the code
that uses the mutex is defined in a libgit.a header file.
Let's use a more appropriate function: `prepare_packing_data()`, which
not only lives in libgit.a, but *has* to be called before the
`packing_data` struct is used that contains that mutex.
This fixes https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/1839.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
pack-objects (mingw): demonstrate a segmentation fault with large deltas
There is a problem in the way 9ac3f0e5b3e4 (pack-objects: fix
performance issues on packing large deltas, 2018-07-22) initializes that
mutex in the `packing_data` struct. The problem manifests in a
segmentation fault on Windows, when a mutex (AKA critical section) is
accessed without being initialized. (With pthreads, you apparently do
not really have to initialize them?)
This was reported in https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/1839.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
projects / thirdparty / git.git / log
