hash: convert `oidcmp()` and `oideq()` to compare whole hash

hash: convert `oidcmp()` and `oideq()` to compare whole hash

With the preceding commit, the hash array of object IDs is now fully
zero-padded even when the hash algorithm's output is smaller than the
array length. With that, we can now adapt both `oidcmp()` and `oideq()`
to unconditionally memcmp(3P) the whole array instead of depending on
the hash size.

While it may feel inefficient to compare unused bytes for e.g. SHA-1, in
practice the compiler should now be able to produce code that is better
optimized both because we have no branch anymore, but also because the
size to compare is now known at compile time. Goldbolt spits out the
following assembly on an x86_64 platform with GCC 14.1 for the old and
new implementations of `oidcmp()`:

    oidcmp_old:
            movsx   rax, DWORD PTR [rdi+32]
            test    eax, eax
            jne     .L2
            mov     rax, QWORD PTR the_repository[rip]
            cmp     QWORD PTR [rax+16], 32
            je      .L6
    .L4:
            mov     edx, 20
            jmp     memcmp
    .L2:
            lea     rdx, [rax+rax*2]
            lea     rax, [rax+rdx*4]
            lea     rax, hash_algos[0+rax*8]
            cmp     QWORD PTR [rax+16], 32
            jne     .L4
    .L6:
            mov     edx, 32
            jmp     memcmp

    oidcmp_new:
            mov     edx, 32
            jmp     memcmp

The new implementation gets ridi of all the branches and effectively
only ends setting up `edx` for `memcmp()` and then calling it.

And for `oideq()`:

    oideq_old:
            movsx   rcx, DWORD PTR [rdi+32]
            mov     rax, rdi
            mov     rdx, rsi
            test    ecx, ecx
            jne     .L2
            mov     rcx, QWORD PTR the_repository[rip]
            cmp     QWORD PTR [rcx+16], 32
            mov     rcx, QWORD PTR [rax]
            je      .L12
    .L4:
            mov     rsi, QWORD PTR [rax+8]
            xor     rcx, QWORD PTR [rdx]
            xor     rsi, QWORD PTR [rdx+8]
            or      rcx, rsi
            je      .L13
    .L8:
            mov     eax, 1
            test    eax, eax
            sete    al
            movzx   eax, al
            ret
    .L2:
            lea     rsi, [rcx+rcx*2]
            lea     rcx, [rcx+rsi*4]
            lea     rcx, hash_algos[0+rcx*8]
            cmp     QWORD PTR [rcx+16], 32
            mov     rcx, QWORD PTR [rax]
            jne     .L4
    .L12:
            mov     rsi, QWORD PTR [rax+8]
            xor     rcx, QWORD PTR [rdx]
            xor     rsi, QWORD PTR [rdx+8]
            or      rcx, rsi
            jne     .L8
            mov     rcx, QWORD PTR [rax+16]
            mov     rax, QWORD PTR [rax+24]
            xor     rcx, QWORD PTR [rdx+16]
            xor     rax, QWORD PTR [rdx+24]
            or      rcx, rax
            jne     .L8
            xor     eax, eax
    .L14:
            test    eax, eax
            sete    al
            movzx   eax, al
            ret
    .L13:
            mov     edi, DWORD PTR [rdx+16]
            cmp     DWORD PTR [rax+16], edi
            jne     .L8
            xor     eax, eax
            jmp     .L14

    oideq_new:
            mov     rax, QWORD PTR [rdi]
            mov     rdx, QWORD PTR [rdi+8]
            xor     rax, QWORD PTR [rsi]
            xor     rdx, QWORD PTR [rsi+8]
            or      rax, rdx
            je      .L5
    .L2:
            mov     eax, 1
            xor     eax, 1
            ret
    .L5:
            mov     rax, QWORD PTR [rdi+16]
            mov     rdx, QWORD PTR [rdi+24]
            xor     rax, QWORD PTR [rsi+16]
            xor     rdx, QWORD PTR [rsi+24]
            or      rax, rdx
            jne     .L2
            xor     eax, eax
            xor     eax, 1
            ret

Interestingly, the compiler decides to split the comparisons into two so
that it first compares the lower half of the object ID for equality and
then the upper half. If the first check shows a difference, then we
wouldn't even end up comparing the second half.

In both cases, the new generated code is significantly shorter and has
way less branches. While I didn't benchmark the change, I'd be surprised
if the new code was slower.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>