From 04c64e3fb35af090c249303b9df0a311f2a07593 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Lane Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 12:06:54 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Remove incorrect entries in pg_walsummary's getopt_long call. For some reason this listed "-f" and "-w" as valid switches, though the code doesn't implement any such thing nor do the docs mention them. The effect of this was that if you tried to use one of these switches, you'd get an unhelpful error message. Yusuke Sugie Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/68e72a2a70f4d84c1c7847b13bcdaef8@oss.nttdata.com --- src/bin/pg_walsummary/pg_walsummary.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/bin/pg_walsummary/pg_walsummary.c b/src/bin/pg_walsummary/pg_walsummary.c index 93f6e6d408a..f6a262d3184 100644 --- a/src/bin/pg_walsummary/pg_walsummary.c +++ b/src/bin/pg_walsummary/pg_walsummary.c @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[]) handle_help_version_opts(argc, argv, progname, help); /* process command-line options */ - while ((c = getopt_long(argc, argv, "f:iqw:", + while ((c = getopt_long(argc, argv, "iq", long_options, &optindex)) != -1) { switch (c) -- 2.47.2