From 101f903e51f52bf595cd8177d2e0bc6fe9000762 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Rowley Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 17:29:52 +1200 Subject: [PATCH] Add comment to explain an unused function parameter Removing the unused 'miinfo' parameter has been raised a couple of times now. It was decided in the 2nd discussion below that we're going to leave it alone. It seems like it might be useful to add a comment to mention this fact so that nobody wastes any time in the future proposing its removal again. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvpCf-qR5HC1rXskUM4ToV+3YDb4-n1meY=vpAHsRS_1PA@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAE9k0P%3DFvcDswnSVtRpSyZMpcAWC%3DGp%3DifZ0HdfPaRQ%3D__LBtw%40mail.gmail.com --- src/backend/commands/copy.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/copy.c b/src/backend/commands/copy.c index 99d14571801..44da71c4cb5 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/copy.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/copy.c @@ -2604,6 +2604,9 @@ CopyMultiInsertInfoCleanup(CopyMultiInsertInfo *miinfo) * Get the next TupleTableSlot that the next tuple should be stored in. * * Callers must ensure that the buffer is not full. + * + * Note: 'miinfo' is unused but has been included for consistency with the + * other functions in this area. */ static inline TupleTableSlot * CopyMultiInsertInfoNextFreeSlot(CopyMultiInsertInfo *miinfo, -- 2.39.5