From 3cb827ad36652d0cfe7cc85c5beb29a5fe2998ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Karel Zak Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 13:44:44 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] hwclock: make tz use more robust [coverity scan] It's probably unnecessary, but let's make it more robust and keep static analyzers happy. Signed-off-by: Karel Zak --- sys-utils/hwclock-parse-date.y | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/sys-utils/hwclock-parse-date.y b/sys-utils/hwclock-parse-date.y index 35669fde81..954bfdc027 100644 --- a/sys-utils/hwclock-parse-date.y +++ b/sys-utils/hwclock-parse-date.y @@ -1298,8 +1298,8 @@ int parse_date(struct timespec *result, char const *p, break; } else if (*s == '"') { char *z; - char *tz1; - char tz1buf[TZBUFSIZE]; + char *tz1 = NULL; + char tz1buf[TZBUFSIZE] = { '\0' }; int large_tz = TZBUFSIZE < tzsize; int setenv_ok; -- 2.47.2