From 49bea821a2edad5e19c3a566d1a80c23718dede9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 14:15:26 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] runqueue: Fix missing fakeworker under dry run

We shouldn't try and use fakeworker when performing a dry_run. This
makes the core match the other fakeworker execution points.

Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 lib/bb/runqueue.py | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/bb/runqueue.py b/lib/bb/runqueue.py
index 1c60d97c7fe..8b3fe5a957c 100644
--- a/lib/bb/runqueue.py
+++ b/lib/bb/runqueue.py
@@ -2069,7 +2069,7 @@ class RunQueueExecuteScenequeue(RunQueueExecute):
             bb.event.fire(startevent, self.cfgData)
 
             taskdep = self.rqdata.dataCache.task_deps[fn]
-            if 'fakeroot' in taskdep and taskname in taskdep['fakeroot']:
+            if 'fakeroot' in taskdep and taskname in taskdep['fakeroot'] and not self.cooker.configuration.dry_run:
                 if not self.rq.fakeworker:
                     self.rq.start_fakeworker(self)
                 self.rq.fakeworker.stdin.write("<runtask>" + pickle.dumps((fn, realtask, taskname, True, self.cooker.collection.get_file_appends(fn), None)) + "</runtask>")
-- 
2.47.3