From 52df783f33ec6df2d592dd12d0afc3265d9e37eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dan Carpenter Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 14:26:00 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] fs/9p: delete unnnecessary condition We already know that "retval" is negative, so there is no need to check again. Also the statement is not indented far enough. Delete it. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter Fixes: 43c36a56ccf6 ("Revert "fs/9p: Refresh metadata in d_revalidate for uncached mode too"") Reviewed-by: Christian Schoenebeck Message-ID: Signed-off-by: Dominique Martinet --- fs/9p/vfs_dentry.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_dentry.c b/fs/9p/vfs_dentry.c index c1acbc98465de..c5bf74d547e84 100644 --- a/fs/9p/vfs_dentry.c +++ b/fs/9p/vfs_dentry.c @@ -109,7 +109,6 @@ static int __v9fs_lookup_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int flags) p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_VFS, "refresh inode: dentry = %pd (%p), got error %pe\n", dentry, dentry, ERR_PTR(retval)); - if (retval < 0) return retval; } } -- 2.47.3