From 54790f4b3f048db8f18e17966ad3bfb428e5b312 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Lane Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 12:22:00 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Doc: Python's control flow construct is try/except not try/catch. Very ancient thinko, dating evidently to 22690719e. Spotted by gweatherby. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/170423637139.1288848.11840082988774620003@wrigleys.postgresql.org --- doc/src/sgml/plpython.sgml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/plpython.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/plpython.sgml index c62361b6f80..d7fbb4da0c4 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/plpython.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/plpython.sgml @@ -1323,7 +1323,7 @@ plan = plpy.prepare("INSERT INTO operations (result) VALUES ($1)", ["text"]) plpy.execute(plan, [result]) $$ LANGUAGE plpythonu; - Note that the use of try/catch is still + Note that the use of try/except is still required. Otherwise the exception would propagate to the top of the Python stack and would cause the whole function to abort with a PostgreSQL error, so that the -- 2.39.5