From 6e6a6ca7d9097d1aa68089379cdaa7553dad7a25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Gibson Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:57:37 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] confidential guest support: Move side effect out of machine_set_memory_encryption() When the "memory-encryption" property is set, we also disable KSM merging for the guest, since it won't accomplish anything. We want that, but doing it in the property set function itself is thereoretically incorrect, in the unlikely event of some configuration environment that set the property then cleared it again before constructing the guest. More importantly, it makes some other cleanups we want more difficult. So, instead move this logic to machine_run_board_init() conditional on the final value of the property. Signed-off-by: David Gibson Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck --- hw/core/machine.c | 17 +++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/core/machine.c b/hw/core/machine.c index 5d6163ab700..919067b5c94 100644 --- a/hw/core/machine.c +++ b/hw/core/machine.c @@ -437,14 +437,6 @@ static void machine_set_memory_encryption(Object *obj, const char *value, g_free(ms->memory_encryption); ms->memory_encryption = g_strdup(value); - - /* - * With memory encryption, the host can't see the real contents of RAM, - * so there's no point in it trying to merge areas. - */ - if (value) { - machine_set_mem_merge(obj, false, errp); - } } static bool machine_get_nvdimm(Object *obj, Error **errp) @@ -1166,6 +1158,15 @@ void machine_run_board_init(MachineState *machine) cc->deprecation_note); } + if (machine->memory_encryption) { + /* + * With memory encryption, the host can't see the real + * contents of RAM, so there's no point in it trying to merge + * areas. + */ + machine_set_mem_merge(OBJECT(machine), false, &error_abort); + } + machine_class->init(machine); phase_advance(PHASE_MACHINE_INITIALIZED); } -- 2.39.5