From 74a06a9f2103332d50ddc17dcd6a0a153a5e377d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf8?q?=C3=86var=20Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0=20Bjarmason?= Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 12:42:51 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] clone: fix memory leak in wanted_peer_refs() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Fix a memory leak added in 0ec4b1650cc (clone: fix ref selection in --single-branch --branch=xxx, 2012-06-22). Whether we get our "remote_head" from copy_ref() directly, or with a call to guess_remote_head() it'll be the result of a copy_ref() in either case, as guess_remote_head() is a wrapper for copy_ref() (or it returns NULL). We can't mark any tests passing passing with SANITIZE=leak using "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" as a result of this change, but e.g. "t/t1500-rev-parse.sh" now gets closer to passing. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano --- builtin/clone.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/builtin/clone.c b/builtin/clone.c index 89a91b0017..c43c85dad0 100644 --- a/builtin/clone.c +++ b/builtin/clone.c @@ -494,6 +494,7 @@ static struct ref *wanted_peer_refs(const struct ref *refs, /* if --branch=tag, pull the requested tag explicitly */ get_fetch_map(remote_head, tag_refspec, &tail, 0); } + free_refs(remote_head); } else { int i; for (i = 0; i < refspec->nr; i++) -- 2.47.3