From 83dae94abedc22bb6ac7c9ba46bd91ca3fa140bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Tromey Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 15:17:51 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] Re-run make-target-delegates.py I re-ran make-target-delegates.py and discovered that the tree was out of sync. This patch corrects the problem. --- gdb/target-delegates.c | 14 ++++++-------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/gdb/target-delegates.c b/gdb/target-delegates.c index af6be0884a1..5fb1c80a9c3 100644 --- a/gdb/target-delegates.c +++ b/gdb/target-delegates.c @@ -4377,16 +4377,14 @@ dummy_target::is_address_tagged (gdbarch *arg0, CORE_ADDR arg1) bool debug_target::is_address_tagged (gdbarch *arg0, CORE_ADDR arg1) { - gdb_printf (gdb_stdlog, "-> %s->is_address_tagged (...)\n", this->beneath ()->shortname ()); + target_debug_printf_nofunc ("-> %s->is_address_tagged (...)", this->beneath ()->shortname ()); bool result = this->beneath ()->is_address_tagged (arg0, arg1); - gdb_printf (gdb_stdlog, "<- %s->is_address_tagged (", this->beneath ()->shortname ()); - target_debug_print_gdbarch_p (arg0); - gdb_puts (", ", gdb_stdlog); - target_debug_print_CORE_ADDR (arg1); - gdb_puts (") = ", gdb_stdlog); - target_debug_print_bool (result); - gdb_puts ("\n", gdb_stdlog); + target_debug_printf_nofunc ("<- %s->is_address_tagged (%s, %s) = %s", + this->beneath ()->shortname (), + target_debug_print_gdbarch_p (arg0).c_str (), + target_debug_print_CORE_ADDR (arg1).c_str (), + target_debug_print_bool (result).c_str ()); return result; } -- 2.39.5