From a3a681f8590d9476c8ce94172316d3d339375fe6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bruce Momjian Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 20:33:32 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] doc: update PG 14 release notes Mostly addition of tags Reported-by: Justin Pryzby Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210629022547.GF21248@telsasoft.com Backpatch-through: 14 only --- doc/src/sgml/release-14.sgml | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/release-14.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/release-14.sgml index e96206f8997..03ee36867a5 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/release-14.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/release-14.sgml @@ -58,8 +58,9 @@ Author: Tom Lane --> - Prevent the containment operators (<@ and @>) for from using GiST indexes (Tom Lane) + Prevent the containment operators (<@ and + @>) for from using + GiST indexes (Tom Lane) @@ -78,8 +79,9 @@ Author: Tom Lane --> - Remove deprecated containment operators @ and ~ for built-in - geometric data types and + Remove deprecated containment operators @ + and ~ for built-in geometric data types and contrib modules , , , and (Justin Pryzby) @@ -1216,7 +1218,7 @@ Author: Etsuro Fujita postgres_fdw - supports these type of scans if async_capable + supports this type of scan if async_capable is set. @@ -2398,7 +2400,9 @@ Author: Tom Lane - This helps GUI tools analyze the system tables. + This helps GUI tools analyze the + system tables. The constraints are visible using pg_get_catalog_foreign_keys(). @@ -2495,15 +2499,16 @@ Author: Tom Lane Add point operators - <<| and |>> to be strictly above/below geometry - (Emre Hasegeli) + <<| and |>> + to be strictly above/below geometry (Emre Hasegeli) - Previously >^ and <^ were marked as performing this test, but - non-point geometric operators used these operators for non-strict - comparisons, leading to confusion. The old operators still exist - but will be eventually removed. ACCURATE? + Previously >^ and <^ + were marked as performing this test, but non-point geometric + operators used these operators for non-strict comparisons, leading + to confusion. The old operators still exist but will be eventually + removed. ACCURATE? -- 2.39.5