From a49668769dd1068d1d60cf7604c5074cdc659ed7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexander Graf Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:56:47 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] target-s390: Fail on unknown instructions We were being a bit too nice and didn't give the guest an invalid instruction interrupt. While that works, it's not exactly the fastest thing to do, since now the guest doesn't know that we're not really implementing that instruction, so it continues doing it. We run into this with the set_page_unstable hint instruction. So let's bail out in these cases. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno (cherry picked from commit d7963c43b9646e4dfc69a4253c61e4bab7b661cd) --- target-s390x/kvm.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/target-s390x/kvm.c b/target-s390x/kvm.c index b6aac424dbb..09925639249 100644 --- a/target-s390x/kvm.c +++ b/target-s390x/kvm.c @@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ static int handle_instruction(CPUState *env, struct kvm_run *run) unsigned int ipa0 = (run->s390_sieic.ipa & 0xff00); uint8_t ipa1 = run->s390_sieic.ipa & 0x00ff; int ipb_code = (run->s390_sieic.ipb & 0x0fff0000) >> 16; - int r = 0; + int r = -1; dprintf("handle_instruction 0x%x 0x%x\n", run->s390_sieic.ipa, run->s390_sieic.ipb); switch (ipa0) { -- 2.39.5