From a88c26bb8e04ee5f2678225c0130a5fbc08eef85 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sven Schnelle Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 15:27:02 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] s390/stackleak: Use exrl instead of ex in __stackleak_poison() exrl is present in all machines currently supported, therefore prefer it over ex. This saves one instruction and doesn't need an additional register to hold the address of the target instruction. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev --- arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h index 8761fd01a9f09..4f8d5592c2981 100644 --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h @@ -163,8 +163,7 @@ static __always_inline void __stackleak_poison(unsigned long erase_low, " la %[addr],256(%[addr])\n" " brctg %[tmp],0b\n" "1: stg %[poison],0(%[addr])\n" - " larl %[tmp],3f\n" - " ex %[count],0(%[tmp])\n" + " exrl %[count],3f\n" " j 4f\n" "2: stg %[poison],0(%[addr])\n" " j 4f\n" -- 2.39.5