From bb6689bbeebc6fb51f0f120b486bdcc9a38ffcf6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kent Overstreet Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 18:26:44 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] bcachefs: delete dead code from may_delete_deleted_inode() Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet --- fs/bcachefs/inode.c | 15 +++------------ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/inode.c b/fs/bcachefs/inode.c index 391daae5c1712..e76721c11eef6 100644 --- a/fs/bcachefs/inode.c +++ b/fs/bcachefs/inode.c @@ -1392,10 +1392,7 @@ int bch2_inode_rm_snapshot(struct btree_trans *trans, u64 inum, u32 snapshot) delete_ancestor_snapshot_inodes(trans, SPOS(0, inum, snapshot)); } -static int may_delete_deleted_inode(struct btree_trans *trans, - struct btree_iter *iter, - struct bpos pos, - bool *need_another_pass) +static int may_delete_deleted_inode(struct btree_trans *trans, struct bpos pos) { struct bch_fs *c = trans->c; struct btree_iter inode_iter; @@ -1484,9 +1481,8 @@ delete: int bch2_delete_dead_inodes(struct bch_fs *c) { struct btree_trans *trans = bch2_trans_get(c); - bool need_another_pass; int ret; -again: + /* * if we ran check_inodes() unlinked inodes will have already been * cleaned up but the write buffer will be out of sync; therefore we @@ -1496,8 +1492,6 @@ again: if (ret) goto err; - need_another_pass = false; - /* * Weird transaction restart handling here because on successful delete, * bch2_inode_rm_snapshot() will return a nested transaction restart, @@ -1507,7 +1501,7 @@ again: ret = for_each_btree_key_commit(trans, iter, BTREE_ID_deleted_inodes, POS_MIN, BTREE_ITER_prefetch|BTREE_ITER_all_snapshots, k, NULL, NULL, BCH_TRANS_COMMIT_no_enospc, ({ - ret = may_delete_deleted_inode(trans, &iter, k.k->p, &need_another_pass); + ret = may_delete_deleted_inode(trans, k.k->p); if (ret > 0) { bch_verbose_ratelimited(c, "deleting unlinked inode %llu:%u", k.k->p.offset, k.k->p.snapshot); @@ -1528,9 +1522,6 @@ again: ret; })); - - if (!ret && need_another_pass) - goto again; err: bch2_trans_put(trans); bch_err_fn(c, ret); -- 2.39.5