From c67989789cec3953effca4e01dff834abff9116a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Amit Langote Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 13:13:48 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] Fix typos in comments Commit 19d8e2308bc added enum values with the prefix TU_, but a few comments still referred to TUUI_, which was used in development versions of the patches committed as 19d8e2308bc. Author: Yugo Nagata Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20250701110216.8ac8a9e4c6f607f1d954f44a@sraoss.co.jp Backpatch-through: 16 --- src/backend/executor/execIndexing.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/executor/execIndexing.c b/src/backend/executor/execIndexing.c index bdf862b2406..ca33a854278 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/execIndexing.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/execIndexing.c @@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ ExecCloseIndices(ResultRelInfo *resultRelInfo) * executor is performing an UPDATE that could not use an * optimization like heapam's HOT (in more general terms a * call to table_tuple_update() took place and set - * 'update_indexes' to TUUI_All). Receiving this hint makes + * 'update_indexes' to TU_All). Receiving this hint makes * us consider if we should pass down the 'indexUnchanged' * hint in turn. That's something that we figure out for * each index_insert() call iff 'update' is true. @@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ ExecCloseIndices(ResultRelInfo *resultRelInfo) * HOT has been applied and any updated columns are indexed * only by summarizing indexes (or in more general terms a * call to table_tuple_update() took place and set - * 'update_indexes' to TUUI_Summarizing). We can (and must) + * 'update_indexes' to TU_Summarizing). We can (and must) * therefore only update the indexes that have * 'amsummarizing' = true. * -- 2.39.5