From c99cec96b8b1e067744b8a70961a3447a2293de0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alvaro Herrera Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 17:39:16 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Fix two typos in a comment They were introduced in 898e5e3290a7; backpatch to 12. --- src/backend/partitioning/partdesc.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/partitioning/partdesc.c b/src/backend/partitioning/partdesc.c index e7f23542e80..0f124a52540 100644 --- a/src/backend/partitioning/partdesc.c +++ b/src/backend/partitioning/partdesc.c @@ -150,9 +150,9 @@ RelationBuildPartitionDesc(Relation rel) * tuple or an old one where relpartbound is NULL. In that case, try * the table directly. We can't just AcceptInvalidationMessages() and * retry the system cache lookup because it's possible that a - * concurrent ATTACH PARTITION operation has removed itself to the - * ProcArray but yet added invalidation messages to the shared queue; - * InvalidateSystemCaches() would work, but seems excessive. + * concurrent ATTACH PARTITION operation has removed itself from the + * ProcArray but not yet added invalidation messages to the shared + * queue; InvalidateSystemCaches() would work, but seems excessive. * * Note that this algorithm assumes that PartitionBoundSpec we manage * to fetch is the right one -- so this is only good enough for -- 2.39.5