From cb898f157f8410a03cf5f3400baa1df9e5eecd33 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Felix Janda Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 08:34:06 +1100 Subject: [PATCH] linux.h: Use off64_t instead of loff_t These are equivalent on glibc, while musl does not know loff_t. In the long run, it would be preferable to enable transparent LFS so that off64_t could be replaced by off_t. Signed-off-by: Felix Janda Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner --- include/linux.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/linux.h b/include/linux.h index 674717cf1..a7d2f850c 100644 --- a/include/linux.h +++ b/include/linux.h @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ platform_discard_blocks(int fd, uint64_t start, uint64_t len) #define EFSCORRUPTED EUCLEAN /* Filesystem is corrupted */ #define EFSBADCRC EBADMSG /* Bad CRC detected */ -typedef loff_t xfs_off_t; +typedef off64_t xfs_off_t; typedef __uint64_t xfs_ino_t; typedef __uint32_t xfs_dev_t; typedef __int64_t xfs_daddr_t; -- 2.47.2